Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-09-2005, 09:55 PM
Iddon's Avatar
Iddon
Registered User

Iddon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 226
My first imaging - 300D

47Tuc
Some nasty star trails there - guess I will have to figure out that wedge!! 12mb down to 125k - though this jpg doesn't look to far from the original image taken at prime throught the 8" Meade. Stacked 15 x 15 sec images at ISO 1600 in Registac and sharpened/contrasted in PS.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc104_processed2small copy.jpg)
124.0 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-09-2005, 10:06 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Well done for a first shot!!!!

Call me stupid, or my eyes are playing tricks on me but the star trails seem to be rotating around 47Tuc, not the celestial pole! That's weird.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-09-2005, 10:07 PM
TidaLpHasE's Avatar
TidaLpHasE
Gone fish'n

TidaLpHasE is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 668
Great for a first image, it can only get better from here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-09-2005, 10:08 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
good start, now for the fun and frustration of astrophotography, a wedge is next.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-09-2005, 11:00 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
And away he gooooes. Good onya Grant. Yes its rotating, but you've collected light and quite a bit of it too. You'll find once you get the hang of focusing you won't need to use the sharpening as heavy either

Ken the circling is brought about by field rotation (which is more than likely from not being polar aligned accurately enough)usually in longer exposures. But in this you will notice there are also double stars. As each double looks pretty similar I'd hazard a guess at poorly aligned by registax, rather than a gear or movement problem. I found I had quite a bit of that when I first started processing DSOs with Registax. IMHO I think its result of polar misalignment. Between each shot the stars rotated just a bit and what Registax may have done is aligned and stacked the first half ok but when it got to the second half the rotation had gotten so much that it aligned the rest on a diffent "centroid" (if thats the word) star. Grant try registaxing again but do it in batches of 5 images only or 3 images only and then stack the results and see how it goes. Don't do any waveletting at the end of each bunch. Either that or take each batch result into Photoshop and stack them there. See if that makes a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-09-2005, 11:20 PM
Iddon's Avatar
Iddon
Registered User

Iddon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 226
thanks for the advice - will try that. This was on the forks, so I believe your are right Paul - star rotation confused Registax. I have the 300D hack done - so I might try ISO3200 and 5 sec images on the forks - might be noisy ??

Neat idea there Paul of stacking a stack - didn't think of that. Thx.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-09-2005, 11:29 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Ok I thought you might have had the wedge on. Then definately field rotation. The longer your focal length the quicker rotation starts up. The further way from 0 dec you get the quicker you'll get field rotation when fork mounted. Though ironically the worst is right on the meridian at 0 dec. If you look at how your fork mounts work you'll see why. There are other areas of the sky that you may also get a bit longer but I can't remember where

Check out this link (infact check out the whole site, its a good one) http://www.allaboutastro.com/Article...drotation.html for details about field rotation

Try the 3200 but I think you'll find it really noisy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-09-2005, 12:04 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
You could also try using Registar.With any field rotation it handles stacking much better than Registax.Send me the images and I will use Registar on them if you want.Registar also produces what are called registered images which very nicely stack since they are corrected for orientation and scale.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-09-2005, 01:35 AM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Congrats ,nice start ....get the wedge out too
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-09-2005, 07:57 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
The other thing you can do with registax Grant is Rotate them first. On the Alignment page of registax on the far right hand side at the top in the options bar is a "Rotate" Button. Ir requires you to make two alignment selections before performing the alignment process. It sometimes helps in these situations
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-09-2005, 07:59 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Quote:
It sometimes helps in these situations
I've tried it, it's marginal at best.. It never does a great job with rotated images unfortunately. I agree with Avandonk that registar is tonnes better at handling field rotation.

Download the trial and try it. Take a screenshot of the final result and paste it in your other image editing software.

great first shot grant!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-09-2005, 08:01 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Good to see you have made a start Greg....nice job

We can play around on Saturday night.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-09-2005, 09:15 AM
astro_south's Avatar
astro_south (Andrew)
No GOTO..I enjoy the hunt

astro_south is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,094
I don't know who Tony's talking too, but good one Grant

I'm purely a visual guy, but from what I've read your on your way to years of learning, fun and reward - all the best for the journey (there is no turning back now!)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-09-2005, 09:22 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
great shot.
I am a visual guy too and therefore dont see field rotation thru the EP... so its nice to know what it looks like

fine first effort!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-09-2005, 01:04 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Greg - Grant....they both start with G......close enough
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-09-2005, 03:52 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Hi Grant and congrats on your start !

Louie
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement