Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-09-2005, 12:36 PM
Roger Davis's Avatar
Roger Davis
Registered User

Roger Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 300
Smooth Movement on Dob Bases

When TeflonŽ pads slide across a surface they are trying to follow the plane of least resistance. The Teflon rides the 'bumps' on the bearing material, usually melamine on most commercial Dobsonians, and as such the force applied can be considered as a tangential to the curve of all of the 'bumps'. If you wish your telescope to perform better in the Azimuth motion, there are two things, or a combination, that you can try. Firstly if you have just the melamine finish, try polishing the tracking area with ArmorallŽ. Not just a swipe like you do to your dash, but a good hard application of two or three coats. The second thing you can do to improve your bearings is to put a disc of Ebony Star Formica (a WilsonArt product) where your melamine surface is (use a contact adhesive like Kwik Grip) and you will have an incredible bearing surface. We talk about this in terms of "sticktion". See Richard Berry's article in Amateur Telescope Making Volume 8 page 26 entitled "How to Control Friction in a Dobsonian Telescope". An excerpt:
"We will now find th azimuth component. Let Rz be the radius of the azimuth bearing. Wz be the combined weight of the telescope and rocker, and A, the altitude angle of the telescope. If L is the length of the telescope between the side bearing and the eyepiece, then Lcos(A) is the moment arm of the eyepiece about the center of the azimuth bearing. Given the coefficient of friction -f - between the materials of the bearing then fWz/3 is the force necessary to move one bearing pad in a straight line, and fWzRz is the torque required to rotate the bearing." If you can follow this then you will really understand the article and how important this "sticktion" is to the ease of 'push'. Great article, sorry the magazine is no longer available. I am prepared to answer any question anyone may have about this! The 27" used to rotate pretty well, jus the vibration of the trusses didn't help!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-09-2005, 12:39 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Great advice Roger, i've moved it to the equipment forum though where it's more appropriate!

I've used furniture polish on the bottom of my base plate to help make it smoother, will try some armorall!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-09-2005, 12:43 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
thanks roger!
armour all is great
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-09-2005, 12:50 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Ive heard many reports that armorall is about the worst thing you can use, with terrible "stiction" being the result.

"stiction" is the difference between static friction, (force required to start moving) and dynamic friction being the force to keep moving. Stiction causes overshoot when making small movements. You push, the scope jumps and then overshoots.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-09-2005, 01:20 PM
Roger Davis's Avatar
Roger Davis
Registered User

Roger Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 300
Never had that problem. Could be that the person using didn't buff the surface enough after the application. Teflon can act as a slippery surface and it is also important to have the pads at the correct size for the weight of your telescope. Yes you are right, the force you apply to the telescope has to overcome the static friction and then the telescope accelerates until a linear velocity is reached that is sufficient to resist the bearing force. As soon as you drop your 'push' pressure the static friction takes over and the whole thing comes to a juddery halt. I quote from Berry and Kriege" The reason Dob buuilders like virgin Teflon and Stardust, Ebondy Star, or glass board laminates so much is that for these particular materials, the coefficients of static and dynamic friction are nearly identical when the surfaces are dry and coating the bearing surface with silicone car wax reduces the differences to zero. There is no 'pop' when the telescope starts to move, only the 'buttery" slide of a true Dobsonian.'
Be aware NEVER use Armorall on your altitude bearings! They will squeak at you all night long!

Last edited by Roger Davis; 21-09-2005 at 01:59 PM. Reason: Ooops, extra info
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-09-2005, 01:34 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
this has worked at treat!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (wedge002.jpg)
28.1 KB93 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-09-2005, 03:04 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
David, what is it, and where did you get it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-09-2005, 03:18 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Why bother with all this?
Tracking planets and other targets at high magnifications then becomes simple instead of an exercise in frustration.

Another factor rarely mentioned is that its very desirable to match the frictions of both alt and az bearings so one can push diagonally for easy tracking.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-09-2005, 03:22 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler
Why bother with all this?
Tracking planets and other targets at high magnifications then becomes simple instead of an exercise in frustration.

Another factor rarely mentioned is that its very desirable to match the frictions of both alt and az bearings so one can push diagonally for easy tracking.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-09-2005, 04:20 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
steve, a lazy susan bearing $20 from most engineering shops
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-09-2005, 04:54 PM
Roger Davis's Avatar
Roger Davis
Registered User

Roger Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 300
Why do we bother with all this?
Simple, you asked for advice from the experienced. Some of us have been doing this for a long time and have been there and done that.
I have lost track of how many Lazy Susans I have pulled off scopes and replaced with teflon and ebony star.
Bearings are fine if you are motorising, the motor acts as a brake, but visually teflon make life easier.
Wait for the first breath of wind with a lazy susan and you will discover why Dobs built that way were dubbed as windvanes!
Lazy Susans also attract dust into the bearings, the edge of the teflon pad acts as a scraper for any dust that can fall "upwards".
Next.....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-09-2005, 05:24 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Hello Roger
Next....
Well my mount has a ring see below that rides on the teflon pads, very smooth.
For those at Snake Valley camp, see for yourself

Similar to what you have advised Roger
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Base ring.JPG)
27.6 KB59 views
Click for full-size image (Teflon pads.JPG)
21.3 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-09-2005, 05:33 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starkler
Another factor rarely mentioned is that its very desirable to match the frictions of both alt and az bearings so one can push diagonally for easy tracking.
As Above post I also did the Alt bearing. Very smooth.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Side bearings.JPG)
35.8 KB48 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-09-2005, 05:50 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
I did the Mod back in May this year!

See here: http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...=super+sliders

Laurie also mentions the use of 'Ebony Star' back then.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21-09-2005, 05:59 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Davis
Why do we bother with all this?
I took Geoffs post as sarcasm.
If anyone can persuade people to improve their dobs motion ,I'm all for it.
I've raised the matter before. To me, to put it bluntly, the base design and alt/az motions on a lot of mass produced scopes are "pretty sucky" and some simple improvements can make viewing a lot more pleasurable.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21-09-2005, 06:03 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Hear Hear! Well said Slick!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 21-09-2005, 06:41 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by slice of heaven
I took Geoffs post as sarcasm.
If anyone can persuade people to improve their dobs motion ,I'm all for it.
I've raised the matter before. To me, to put it bluntly, the base design and alt/az motions on a lot of mass produced scopes are "pretty sucky" and some simple improvements can make viewing a lot more pleasurable.
I wasnt trying to be sarcastic. Maybe I was stating the obvious but my comment was intended for anyone who stumbled across the thread not knowing why we might bother to do these things to a dob.

Quite right about the movements of mass produced dobs, and maybe many of the people who buy one and then wish for an eq mount, would be happier knowing how to fix their dobs motions.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21-09-2005, 06:45 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Rhetorical?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 21-09-2005, 06:55 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Sorry Geoff , I misinterpreted your post.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 21-09-2005, 07:02 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Loved reading all the info guys (both here and on the GS Dob Help thread). Thanks! (though I'm as confused than ever)
I need to do something about my Dob, because I want the motion much smoother than it is now. But I also want it very steady (not a bumpy ride), so that when motorised it will trace a nice clean arc in the sky. Laminates, vinyl records, lazy suzan bearings, I'll have to look into all of the above.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement