Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-03-2009, 12:35 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
NGC4945 slightly more frames

Hi,

this result from tonight.
More frames compared to my Mar 17 result.
Tonight's stack was 159 frames.
Also, let the RA drift a bit and captured some
frames of NGC 4976.

4945 again looks ok right now on the dome CRT but I suspect it's
noisy on an LCD monitor.
Lots more frames needed to drop the noise floor.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (159fr_result_qm_str_shrpn_hist_titles.jpg)
95.1 KB49 views
Click for full-size image (NGC4976_qm_str_shrpn_hist.jpg)
74.0 KB27 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-03-2009, 01:48 AM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
Hey that's looking much better Steve.

Getting some nice structure appearing now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-03-2009, 01:47 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Definitely better Steve,
You have some nice structure in 4945 and the more signal you get the smoother it is going to be.

Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-03-2009, 09:59 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Hi,

thanks guys,
Tonight I tried a combine of the Mar 17 frames and
the Mar 22 frames.
The combination brings back the dark frame artifact but
waters it's effect down a bit.

I also discovered that saving a JPEG with ZERO compression and
keeping a crop just below 200kB, I get rid of a lot of the noise.
Der!...

It's obvious that even saved as a 5% compression JPEG contributes
a lot to the noise. Funny how such an obvious thing right at the end
of a large processing routine can trip me up!

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mar17_mar22_frames.jpg)
195.0 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-03-2009, 07:28 AM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
well done
focus might be a very slight bit out? Using a Bhatinov mask?
frank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-03-2009, 01:30 AM
JD2439975's Avatar
JD2439975 (Justin)
Cloud hater

JD2439975 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Conondale QLD
Posts: 493
Very noticable difference to noise in that last image, way less.
And that's with only 5% compression!! must remember that for future reference.

So Steve, any plans to put colour filters in that DSI ?

A Bahtinov mask yes...must make myself one of those.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-03-2009, 07:18 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Lookin good Steve! Getting images nice under 200k can be a challenge ex with lots of stars or background noise.
Now some color
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement