Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-01-2009, 08:09 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Cg4 (ngc 2427)

Here is my version of CG4.

Taken a couple of weeks ago at my dark site using the Tak BRC 250 and
Apogee U16M camera.

Good seeing.

LRGB 105 45 45 30

A hard object to process as it is again another dim object. I processed this one from scratch about 3 times.

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/108067018

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-01-2009, 08:36 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
I get lots of square stars and pixles.
Are you sure that is Ngc 2427?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-01-2009, 08:46 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
I get lots of square stars and pixles.
Are you sure that is Ngc 2427?

Hi Ron,

I am not sure what you mean. It is a largish image -2mb.
The BRC does give diffraction spikes on brighter stars. They can look
a bit squarish. Like an ASA Newtonian scope that way. I don't mind them myself.

Not sure what you mean about pixels.

Yes you are right, NGC 2427 is one of the galaxies in the image not another designation for CG4.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-01-2009, 08:51 PM
spearo's Avatar
spearo (Frank)
accepts all donations

spearo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Braidwood (outskirts)
Posts: 2,281
Cool dont get to see that target very often!
frank
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-01-2009, 09:01 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Greg,My screen only shows the top half of the picture clear and the and the bottom all pixleated or all unresolved.
It is probably my computer as Spearo can see the image OK.
It Seems the original image is to big?
The image comes comes out alright in the large format.

Last edited by astroron; 13-01-2009 at 09:05 PM. Reason: more information
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-01-2009, 10:14 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Wow. Very cool ... Love the dark cloud (v shape). Deep shot. There's a couple of galaxies fully resolved around too. Top work.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-01-2009, 10:36 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron View Post
Greg,My screen only shows the top half of the picture clear and the and the bottom all pixleated or all unresolved.
It is probably my computer as Spearo can see the image OK.
It Seems the original image is to big?
The image comes comes out alright in the large format.
Hi Ron,

I was wondering if I should compress the image a bit more. I reduced the image size to 1200 by 1200 like I normally do yet the image was still over 2mb.

These large chip cameras have large image files. A 1x1 binned subexposure is 32.8mb. I can only process 4 or 5 subexposures at a time before I get memory warnings in CCDstack.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-01-2009, 10:40 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Wow. Very cool ... Love the dark cloud (v shape). Deep shot. There's a couple of galaxies fully resolved around too. Top work.
Thanks Marc.

I was happy about the depth as well. I had to drop out one of the blue subexposures as it was taken at about 4:20am and thats when dawn starts and the image had too much daylight in it.

In summer the usable imaging time seems to be about 9:45pm to 4:30am at the latest or less than 7 hours.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-01-2009, 10:43 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Thanks Greg, I am not an astroimager, so don't understand much about the intracasies of digital imaging.
You do a good job anyway.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-01-2009, 10:46 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
another beauty Greg congrats
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-01-2009, 11:06 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Greg,

Awesome.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-01-2009, 12:47 AM
KenGee's Avatar
KenGee (Kenith Gee)
Registered User

KenGee is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Laura
Posts: 599
Looks good Greg, I get the feeling though your going to play with this one. To me the data looks good, but the colours look a little forced. It could be you often see this coloured greener.
That Tak is a bute.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement