Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-12-2008, 02:38 PM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
In Search of the Crab Nebula (M1)

Well, it was a nice clear night up here last night... quite cool as well. So I decided to do a little stargazing. Went searching for the Crab Nebula (M1).

I was pretty sure that I was in the right area; followed the line of the bull's horn from Aldebaran to the next brightest star...

The only thing that I could find near that star was a very, very faint (roughly) circular fuzzy patch which looked more like a faint globular cluster than the Crab Nebula...

So, do you think this was it or had I drifted off track?

Any suggestions would be appreciated!!

Mark

PS Was looking through a 10 inch Skywatcher dob with 25mm eyepiece and moderately dark skies.

Last edited by mcross; 23-12-2008 at 03:15 PM. Reason: Spelling error
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-12-2008, 02:55 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Crab Nebula

Hi Mark & All,

It certainly sounds from your description of where it was and how it looked that you've got it.

The NGC/IC project page

http://www.ngcic.org/pubdb.htm

for the Crab nebula (NGC 1952 or M1) provides the following descriptions by Steve Gottlieb (an observer of the highest repute) with different sized 'scopes:

17.5": very bright, unusual potato shape with an irregular surface brightness,
6'x4', broad concentration towards center. Very irregular elongated shape with
extensions or "arms" towards the NW and SE, ragged edges at periphery. A large
dark indentation or "bay" intrudes on the NE side of the SE extension, so this
end is thinner and less prominent. A few faint stars are superimposed. Using
an OIII filter, the overall structure is muted but a bright inner streak is
visible which is not noticeable without the filter.

13": large, bright, irregular potato shape, large indentation on following emd.

8": moderately bright, irregular shape, fairly large, indentation on the NW and
SE ends.

- by Steve Gottlieb

My own notes using 25cm back in 1997 observing from suburbia with a ZLM of about mag +5 were:

x86 34' TF Mag 8.7 Size 6' Only 20 degrees above the NE horizon. in a brighter area of the sky. Appears fairly sizable cloud, 5' x 3.5' in PA 130. No *s immediately associated. Grows broadly and slightly to centre. Visible easily at x56 without filter. The brightest portions, and those which respond most strongly to the UHC filterhave a wide "S" or "Z" shape overlay the centre.

Hope this helps -- from your description I think you've got it.


Best wishes for the season to yourself and all,


Les D

Last edited by ngcles; 23-12-2008 at 05:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-12-2008, 03:11 PM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
Thanks Les,

Very much appreciate your detailed reply! Will have to return to M1 to look again!

Hope you have a great Festive Season too.

Cheers,

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-12-2008, 03:49 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Sounds like it, Mark. A soft grey cloud in the sky. Relatively easy to find. But on my first attempt, I started hopping from the wrong star. Was very lost and disappointed for 10 or 15 min until I had the Duuuh! moment!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-12-2008, 04:07 PM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by erick View Post
I started hopping from the wrong star. Was very lost and disappointed for 10 or 15 min
...or an hour! Know that feeling well!

Thanks Erick - does sound like it. While I realize that nebulae through the 'scope don't look like they do in the astronomy books, it was the "softness" that surprised me a little. Thought it would be a little brighter through the 10 inch.

Thanks again,

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-12-2008, 05:32 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Unfortunately as humans we are designed to run in bright sunlight, sometimes i wish i had a owl's vision now thats some kick ass night sight

Rods and Cones one or the other of them we have very few and they only line the outside of our retena hence why averted vision is the best way to view most faint fuzzys, its because the light is landing on the right eye sensors.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-12-2008, 05:33 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Nope, pretty unimpressive for the first one in the Catalog. Thank goodness they get better after that!

Last edited by erick; 23-12-2008 at 05:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-12-2008, 06:04 PM
Enchilada
Enhanced Astronomer

Enchilada is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 753
Post

Try this interesting page on historical observation and some of the older descriptions for comparison;

http://homepage.mac.com/andjames/NGC1952.htm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-12-2008, 09:05 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
I was looking at M1 last night too. Unfortunately my northern horizon looks straight into the lights of Gosford, so it becomes a very unimpressive object, even with 20 inches of aperture. It responds quite well to an OIII filter.

At the end of the day, I think M1 is a very disappointing visual object....better left to the imagers to take long exposure shots for us. M2 is far better!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-12-2008, 08:36 AM
GrahamL's Avatar
GrahamL
pro lumen

GrahamL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ballina
Posts: 3,265
Yes its not a lot to look at sometimes ,, It dosn't get very high and as such average seeing dosn't do it any favours ,, anyone viewed it from northern latitudes ?.


Its an interesting object historicaly in that its formation was likely
noted by other astronomers almost a thousand years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crab_Nebula
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-12-2008, 11:40 AM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightstalker View Post
It dosn't get very high and as such average seeing dosn't do it any favours
That's a good point - I hadn't considered that
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodstar View Post
It responds quite well to an OIII filter.
My viewing has been so inconsistent I forgot that I have a Nebula filter! That's my "doh" moment, Erick!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
averted vision is the best way to view most faint fuzzys, its because the light is landing on the right eye sensors.
Agreed!

Thanks Enchilada for the historical observation info - was an interesting read. Thanks again, all. Will visit M1 again soon, with filter...

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:02 PM
mark3d
Registered User

mark3d is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmitchell82 View Post
Unfortunately as humans we are designed to run in bright sunlight, sometimes i wish i had a owl's vision now thats some kick ass night sight

Rods and Cones one or the other of them we have very few and they only line the outside of our retena hence why averted vision is the best way to view most faint fuzzys, its because the light is landing on the right eye sensors.
i believe some whales have pupils bigger than my 10" mirror... they must be able to see so much (granted, with 1x magnification).. but still the sky must look awesome to them!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:34 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Mark, as you get to be a more skilled observer you will see more in the Crab nebula than you see now.
I have observed the Crab Neb hundreds of times and on good nights can see some of the very faint foreground stars and quite a lot of detail, but a Dark Sky and Good Seeing are required.
One Tip, use a dark cloth over your head to block any unwanted light, you will gain possibly upto half a mag in brightness.
Cheers
Ron
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:39 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Mark, I have just noticed that you live in Nambour
Why don't you come and join us on the 27th, this coming Saturday, we would be glad of your company
Ron
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24-12-2008, 10:51 PM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
Thanks, Ron!
I have been meaning to get to one of these gatherings, but dates have sometimes clashed! We have a house warming to go to on the Gold Coast on Sunday, which might throw a spanner into the works; I will let you know if I am able to make it. Otherwise a New Year's resolution may well be to definitely make it to at least one!
Thanks again,
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-12-2008, 10:09 AM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Good morning all,

Well i have to say like the reports have all said, M1 is very un inspiering! within saying that i sat there for a good 30 min on sat/sunday night going though all sorts of magnifications! Though i can say it is a very distinctive grey smudge
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-01-2009, 12:26 AM
Crusader
Registered User

Crusader is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 100
Also viewed M1 with my 10" on New years eve. Couldn't see any detail aside from the elongated patch of nebulosity. Glad that I'm not in the minority there. Will definitely give it another go under better conditions.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-01-2009, 01:12 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crusader View Post
Will definitely give it another go under better conditions.
I was under the best of conditions I know this because there where some old timers that told me it was plus i could quite happily push the x500 in the skywatcher. so all in all it will look like a fuzzy gray patch
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-01-2009, 10:41 PM
mcross
Registered User

mcross is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 52
I haven't had a chance to have another look - too cloudy!

I will, however, try it with the nebula filter & maybe even Ron's suggestion of a dark cloth!

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-01-2009, 05:57 AM
Crusader
Registered User

Crusader is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcross View Post
I haven't had a chance to have another look - too cloudy!

I will, however, try it with the nebula filter & maybe even Ron's suggestion of a dark cloth!

Mark
With an O-III filter it darkened the nebula considerably, but provided some hints of dark filaments around the edges. Also made 2 very faint stars visible in the central region.

Still have to revisit it myself. Either too cloudy or too windy, just can't seem to get decent observing conditions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement