Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-08-2005, 06:18 AM
Argonavis's Avatar
Argonavis (William)
E pur si muove

Argonavis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 745
NASA Moon Landing Hoax - new evidence

go to:

http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellan...onlanding.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-08-2005, 12:10 PM
mojo's Avatar
mojo (Terry)
iceinspace

mojo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,665
"Discussions related to the Science of Astronomy, Space Exploration etc. Strictly moderated - stay on-topic, serious discussions please."

but that is damn funny.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-08-2005, 04:11 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Actually the landing debunkers missed a crucial piece of evidence in their photos. Notice the smoke rising from the exhaust of the landing thruster in the first photo. Smoke rises because it is hot and lighter than colder air which displaces the smoke. Where did the air come from to displace the smoke in an upward direction. In space the smoke would continue towards the direction it it was ejected.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-08-2005, 04:28 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
blast crater from the thrusters? there would have been plumes of dust, not a crater!

that said the last pic is obviously not fake... we know what aliens look like
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-08-2005, 05:32 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Lol, I'm bookmarking that one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-08-2005, 06:28 PM
Orion's Avatar
Orion
Obsessed

Orion is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Swansea N.S.W.
Posts: 1,107
Thanks argonavis my wife and I could not stop laughing!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-08-2005, 08:03 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Well, I'm convinced. Can't beat proof like that!

Pity, coz I really thought they went.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-08-2005, 08:09 PM
robin's Avatar
robin
Brave Sir Robin

robin is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Warrnambool,Victoria
Posts: 489
I never thought of that one Paul.....Good point!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-08-2005, 08:43 PM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
Its all a communist plot ....we we we know, dont you worry about that.
Golly gosh, that brings back memories for anyone from Qld in the 80's .. by jingo.
We could have had our own spaceport back then ... then we would have shown them !
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-08-2005, 08:48 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
@ Ian. I could even hear the Kiwi accent.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:11 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
Gee there are some sad people here! truth is more presentable when you really want to believe it! At least thats what the Easter Bunny told me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:18 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Frankly I think that the above linked page was put together by NASA to debunk the debunkers.

It's obviously intended to show that the hoaxers can't thoroughly analyse an image to extract the most important information from it. If they miss that crucial and obvious bit of information that will certainly colour peoples perception of the other hard won facts they have unearthed.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:20 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
Frankly I think that the above linked page was put together by NASA to debunk the debunkers.

It's obviously intended to show that the hoaxers can't thoroughly analyse an image to extract the most important information from it. If they miss that crucial and obvious bit of information that will certainly colour peoples perception of the other hard won facts they have unearthed.
did you breathe at least once when you typed that
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:23 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Only from the helium side of my tank.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:26 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
Only from the helium side of my tank.

I thought i heard Daffy Duck My hat goes off to the guy/s who created that. they have no life and a beaute sense of humour
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 19-08-2005, 09:41 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I just can't understand how they missed the obvious fraudulence in this shot
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (h0ughy-on-the-moon.jpg)
27.3 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19-08-2005, 10:00 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Yes I see the artificial studio lighting now from these two shadows. Everything else in the frame looks normal!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (MOON2.jpg)
29.2 KB13 views
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19-08-2005, 10:04 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I don't know. How do the debunkers ever expect us to take their evidence seriously when they miss such obvious details.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19-08-2005, 10:07 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
I just can't understand how they missed the obvious fraudulence in this shot

oh my, its planet Hough!!!!!!!! bad moon rising.......
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement