Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-05-2008, 09:52 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Suggestions needed on entry level ED/APO for DSLR photography?

Hi Guys, any advice, experience, recommendations on a smallish 70-90mm ED refractor for DSLR photography - where's the best Bang for buck.

I did see a 72mm Lorng Pern ED refractor for $499 in the latest Andrews ads - has anyone had any experience to share with this one, or anything similar.

I'll be wanting to piggy back it on a C9.25.

thanks,

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2008, 06:44 AM
montewilson's Avatar
montewilson (Monte)
Registered User

montewilson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 374
Whatever you get it will need a field flattener too, I know nothing about this scope. William optics is a good starting choice too. You could also consider a second hand zoom / telephoto lens.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2008, 06:52 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I don't know about the Long Pern scopes either.

But for entry level, you can't go past an ED80 (any brand). I've got the Saxon brand and it's great for the price.

If you want a bit of a flatter field and sharper lens, start looking at Taks and Williams Optics, but then they're hardly entry level as you're spending thousands then, instead of hundreds.

As Monte said, with an ED80 you'll also want to consider the WO 0.8x reducer or similar, as there's a bit of field curvature in the ED80's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:18 AM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Thanks Guys, hmmm, field flattener? How much do those run to?

I can see this new direction has some hidden extras to strain the wallet lining
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:58 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I warned you Robert, it's a slippery slope.. and the better you want to get at it, the more cash you have to outlay

Field-flatteners range from $200-$300 for name-brand ones.

Paul has done a review of some of them in the articles section.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:26 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Steep as well as slippery.
Mike is out of touch price-wise.
The best rated reducer/flattener is the Televue. I should know I need one.
https://www.bintelshop.com.au/Product.aspx?ID=7387
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:57 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
Rob,

I'm no expert but the Meade Series 5000 ED80 is a triplet and works nicely without a flattener. Although the OTA is a bit more expensive than the Skywatcher etc you might save the difference by not needing another bit of gear - something to consider.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:51 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
or you could tempt yourself with a 127 ED..................
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-05-2008, 09:20 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
or you could tempt yourself with a 127 ED..................

You are incorrigable hOughy .....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-05-2008, 10:07 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Robinson View Post
You are incorrigable hOughy .....
no not i

want an apple........

seriously if these scope prove themselves just over a grand......
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2008, 02:20 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
Hi Rob

I’ve found that with the (obsolete) WO Megrez 80mm ED II F7 triplet apo there is no CA but with the WO 66mm F6 Petzval there is strong CA evident, although this comes as no surprise considering their specification and price differences.

Again, the more you pay, the better you gets, mostly!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2008, 07:38 AM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
seriously if these scope prove themselves just over a grand......

just over a grand?for a 5in ED?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-05-2008, 05:10 PM
JimmyH155
Registered User

JimmyH155 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Burpengary
Posts: 619
Look in the telescope ads. How about my Celestron 90 mm?? Any good????
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-05-2008, 05:23 PM
Screwdriverone's Avatar
Screwdriverone (Chris)
I have detailed files....

Screwdriverone is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
Hi Robert,

Here ya go,

PROED80 ED OTA Apochromatic refractor 80mm x 600mm OTA is gold in colour and features a 2" Crayford style focuser with a 2" to 1.25" reducer fitted.
It is supplied with a matching gold coloured 9 x 50 finderscope in a white holder, white tube rings, 200m longblack aluminium dovetail bar, 2" diagonal, LET 5mm and 20mm eyepieces and aluminium carry case!

$599 from Andrews

Enough said.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-05-2008, 05:54 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyH155 View Post
Look in the telescope ads. How about my Celestron 90 mm?? Any good????
sorry Jimmy needs to be an ED or otherwise apo refractor for imaging ...at least for me.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-05-2008, 06:25 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
After having seen SW ed80 and Meade ED80 I would recommend the latter due to its very flat field and non-existent CA
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-05-2008, 07:32 AM
dazastar
Registered User

dazastar is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Caboolture
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
I don't know about the Long Pern scopes either.

But for entry level, you can't go past an ED80 (any brand). I've got the Saxon brand and it's great for the price.

If you want a bit of a flatter field and sharper lens, start looking at Taks and Williams Optics, but then they're hardly entry level as you're spending thousands then, instead of hundreds.

As Monte said, with an ED80 you'll also want to consider the WO 0.8x reducer or similar, as there's a bit of field curvature in the ED80's.
Acually William Optics arn't manufacturers at all, there resellers who have their brandname on the products they obtain from Long Perng. So - If you want the same quality, by a Long Perng at half the price of the re-badged ones.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement