Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-04-2008, 10:13 AM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Rosette

Here's a pic of the Rosette nebula from about 6 weeks ago.

Details:

WO ZS110 Apo with 0.8 Focal Reducer
Canon 350D, unmodified
Autoguided with Orion Starshoot AG
6 x 10min @ 800ISO lights, calibrated with darks only
Losmandy GM8

A lot of work went into beating up the red in PS. I also need to fiddle with the so-called field flattener, because the corner stars are quite elongated. It's not the same all round because I cropped some of the left edge--nebula wasn't quite centered.
Geoff
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Rosette v4a flat.jpg)
181.6 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-04-2008, 01:30 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Nice shot Geoff.
How come the field flattener hasn't flattened the field?
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-04-2008, 02:11 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeal View Post
Nice shot Geoff.
How come the field flattener hasn't flattened the field?
Gary
Not entirely sure, but I was speaking to Iceman at the SPSP and he mentioned he had a similar problem, which he thinks he has fixed. It's a bit hard to explain without a picture or the object in hand, but basically there are three screws which if not tightened up correctly may set the distance between camera and FF slightly wrong. Haven't had a chance to retry.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-04-2008, 06:15 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
I wondered that. While I thought the dedicated FF would be a fixed distance, the likes of my Baader MPCC needs about 56mm from rear to chip, and anything else makes a difference.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-04-2008, 06:53 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
remarkable amount of Ha recorded for a stock camera
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-04-2008, 11:13 AM
winensky's Avatar
winensky
Registered User

winensky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ballarat Vic
Posts: 268
Lovel image. Good range of colours. I was going to ask about the Ha too. It seems that the modded DSLRS are capable of picking up this region well and so provide a balanced spectrum. Am I correct in this or have I missed something being done in the processing?

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-04-2008, 03:05 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by winensky View Post
Lovel image. Good range of colours. I was going to ask about the Ha too. It seems that the modded DSLRS are capable of picking up this region well and so provide a balanced spectrum. Am I correct in this or have I missed something being done in the processing?

Kind regards
Matt
Well I certainly bumped up the red in Photoshop, but there has to be something there to play with in the first place. Unmodified DSLRs do pick up H alpha--they are just not very good at it. I think they only record about 10% of the H alpha
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-04-2008, 06:46 PM
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Phil H

Phil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cowra NSW
Posts: 1,497
Nice shot Geoff love the colour.
Phil
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement