Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-03-2008, 08:24 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Jewelbox (NGC4755), Mimosa and DY Crucis

Hi all

Here's an image taken back on the 1st March, of the Jewelbox and surrounds.

It's a combination of 17x 60s exposures and 6x 3-4 minute exposures, all @ ISO800 with the unmodded 350D + ED80 + WO 0.8x reducer.

My polar alignment wasn't very accurate so there's some elongated stars in the full version, but luckily the websize hides most of those nasties

The diffraction spikes were created with some wool sticky-taped to the dewshield. it's all I could find at the time

I'm very happy with the colours in this shot - next time I'll stick to the 60s exposures and just do lots more of them. With long exposures, the jewelbox just gets washed out and completely saturated.

It's my first image of one my favourite open clusters in the sky, so I'm happy to have captured it finally.

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20080301-jewelbox800px.jpg)
197.9 KB121 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2008, 08:44 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Here's a 1200px wide, 700kb less compressed version:

Jewelbox + surrounds
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2008, 08:52 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
Very nice Mike - the new 1200px version shows off this region so much better than the smaller one in the 1st post, the detail being so much cleaner and more clear due to the higher resolution. The star colours are just beautiful - did you pump the colour or saturation?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:39 AM
Zuts
Registered User

Zuts is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis View Post
Very nice Mike - the new 1200px version shows off this region so much better than the smaller one in the 1st post, the detail being so much cleaner and more clear due to the higher resolution. The star colours are just beautiful - did you pump the colour or saturation?

Cheers

Dennis
Hi Mike,

The background stars look great. My only thought is that with something as small as the jewel box then unless you are at a very long focal length it is beter without the diffraction spikes as they tend to bunch up in the small cluster of stars.

Maybe a smaller crop would bring them out better.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2008, 11:53 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
And Murphy has his way - DY Crucis is almost under a diffraction spike!

I always love the Jewel Box. Nice image, Mike!

Last edited by erick; 12-03-2008 at 01:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:18 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Beautiful image there, another very rich starfield
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2008, 01:53 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Nice one Mike, some real fresh colours in that one, it is a top image, well done.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-03-2008, 03:43 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Great looking image Mike and how rich is that starfield.

Top stuff
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2008, 11:09 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
beautful shot there mike heaps of colours in the stars.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-03-2008, 06:32 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks guys, appreciate the comments.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-03-2008, 08:25 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
It's a combination of 17x 60s exposures and 6x 3-4 minute exposures, all @ ISO800 with the unmodded 350D + ED80 + WO 0.8x reducer.
Very cool Mike. What did you stack the subs with and how did you deal with noise on the 3-4 minutes subs?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 13-03-2008, 08:32 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Marc.
I used ImagesPlus for flats calibration and align TSR and combine (adaptive add stack).

I used Photoshop for noise reduction. I used ICNR for darks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement