Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-12-2007, 05:38 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
Why is saturn so dim???? 31st Dec

Paul was telling me the other night how dim was saturn was and so I decided to give it try this morning.

I could only capture at 7.5 fps and with the clear filter.......the histogram may have topped out at 140 max i reckon.

Anyway, the bands are viewable.......it may be a good excuse to go a 16" mirror
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (saturn_071230_1729UT.jpg)
5.1 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-12-2007, 07:12 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,431
yes it sound to me as though you may indeed have to go to a 16" David

would it be because the rings are moving to edge on

Last edited by h0ughy; 31-12-2007 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-12-2007, 08:44 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's a massive image scale, David! Is it enlarged?

I know what you mean about it being dim - very difficult to capture.

You've done a great job to start the season, I love it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-12-2007, 09:06 AM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,481
Nice going Dave, yep, due to the tilt of the rings I suspect. Massive scale there!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-12-2007, 09:40 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
you might be right there houghy...........i do need a 16"......seriously, the rings may not be reflecting as much light our way.

Mike and John, i used the 100mm extension tube, which i think gave me 7.7x.......i better check birds calculator.

I then did a 1.5 upscale using ninox
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-12-2007, 10:16 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,655
Wow nice image scale David, even taking into account the x1.5 upscale.
Surely it must be dimmer due to the shallow ring angle.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-12-2007, 10:33 AM
OneOfOne's Avatar
OneOfOne (Trevor)
Meteor & fossil collector

OneOfOne is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
I would expect the angle will reduce the brightness overall, making it appear dimmer to the eye, but the brightness of the planet itself should remain the same.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-12-2007, 10:23 PM
bird (Anthony Wesley)
Cyberdemon

bird is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rubyvale QLD
Posts: 2,627
Nice scale there DP. Your image scale pretty much matches with mine for the saturn data I grabbed this morning, I'm also using a 3/2 resample before processing.

Here's my capture settings:

Image scale: 14m focal length, pixel size 7.4u
Red channel: 17fps max gain
Green channel: 17fps max gain
Blue channel: 15fps max gain
camera: PGR dragonfly2

The image is very dim at this scale, so the 12-bit data from the camera is likely to be 10 or 11 bit, not too much of a loss and the seeing has been bad enough around here to want the higher fps. Just means I have to capture 2x as much data :-)

Saturn will get a bit brighter and larger near opposition.

cheers, Bird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement