Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 13-12-2007, 04:46 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Milky Way found to spin both ways

This is an article from NineMSN ...........

Milky Way found to spin both ways


Thursday Dec 13 09:44 AEDT
Two scientists studying at the Australian National University are part of an international team that has discovered the Milky Way galaxy actually spins in different directions.
In their paper to be published in the journal Nature, the scientists describe how the outer edge of the Milky Way, the halo, is made up of two components that rotate in opposite directions.
The findings prove that the Milky Way halo was not assembled all at once but rather over time, something scientists have suspected for around 30 years.
The lead author of the report, Daniela Carollo, a researcher at Italy's Torino observatory now undertaking her Phd in Canberra, said that they made the discovery by studying the motions and chemical makeup of the halo.
"By examining the motions and chemical makeup of the stars, we can see that the inner and outer halos are quite different beasts and they probably formed in different ways at different times," Ms Carollo said.
The discovery also shows that the different parts of the halo have different chemical makeups with the inner stars containing three times more heavy elements than outer halo stars.
Ms Carollo said that these differences gave a much clearer picture of the formation of the early universe.
"Although it was once considered a single structure, an analysis of the stars shows that the halo is clearly divisible into two, broadly overlapping components. The discovery gives us a much clearer picture of the formation of the first objects in our galaxy and in the entire universe," she said.
This discovery may help to find some of the most primitive stars in the galaxy a quest that another team member ANU Professor John Norris has spent more than two decades on.
"These fossils of the early universe are extremely rare so finding them remains a classic needle in a haystack problem and the discovery of a chemically distinct outer halo, gives us a much better way to search the haystack," he said.





Just thought someone may be interested in this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-12-2007, 05:11 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,432
I heard this on ABC radio this morning...

curiouser and curiouser...

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-12-2007, 08:41 AM
mlcolbert
Registered User

mlcolbert is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 96
definitely! thanks for that!


michael
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-12-2007, 02:29 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Makes me wonder if it is the result of a galactic collision in the past perhaps ?

We all know that we a headed for a collision with M31, the Andromeda Galaxy, in the future !

Still very strange to have bi-directional revolution !

Anyone else have any theories ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-12-2007, 02:16 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Does anyone have any leads to more on this?

..an artist impression maybe?

This may be evidence for the jets falling back to the galaxy as they would probably spiral out in different rotations..if anyone can see what I mean..er need to know my earlier comments on jets in another thread...sorry.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-12-2007, 05:50 PM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
Well I never.... the Milky Way is transexual. Well I guess that accounts for
Oxford St

Interesting theory... how would this be?

regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-12-2007, 08:48 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
When I get the artist impression I will explain it all
alex
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-12-2007, 10:09 AM
rally
Registered User

rally is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 896
Alex,

Heres some more detail and an artists impression.

http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/07121226.htm

Confession now required !#?!

Cheers rally
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-12-2007, 12:44 PM
Argonavis's Avatar
Argonavis (William)
E pur si muove

Argonavis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 745
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluescope View Post
Still very strange to have bi-directional revolution !

Anyone else have any theories ?
I am not sure that this changes anything much in the galaxy evolution field, but perhaps makes it a little more complex.

The last few years has seen the bottom up scenario for galaxy evolution favoured, where large galaxies like the milky way being shown to be an aggregation of smaller galaxies merged and swallowed over eons of time.

This evidence would give equal weight to the top down scenario, where large galaxies like our own are the product of the collapse of immense gas clouds early in the universe's history. It seem likely that there were at least 2 of these immense clouds interacting in this early era, before settling down and proceeding to amalgamate lots of smaller already formed galaxies in the time since.


You can imagine a giant gas cloud collapsing and forming a nascent milky way, then colliding with another giant gas cloud that now forms the halo. I imagine the nascent milky way would cannibalise much of the second gas clouds mass and then using it for star formation inside the galactic disk, whilst leaving a fossil gas remnant still orbiting prograde (at least from the solar systems perspective).

With the much younger and smaller universe the milky way would then cannibalise other possibly smaller, possibly larger galaxies in the immediate neighborhood to build the galactic empire. M31 is next, although M31 being much larger would no doubt view it the other way around, as being the cannibal rather than the cannibalee.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-12-2007, 08:10 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by rally View Post
Alex,

Heres some more detail and an artists impression.

http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/07121226.htm

Confession now required !#?!

Cheers rally
Thanks for that..
What confession would you like me to make?
alex
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-12-2007, 08:26 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I can not see why the outter halo would be going the other way if those stars were part of the original galaxy.
I think Will's approach in suggesting two bodies has merit.
I have believed for some time that galaxies consume others to grow and on this approach one could think that the outter halo is all that is left of a galaxy we have encountered that was rotating in an opposite direction.
alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement