Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Poll: What resolution do you run at?
Poll Options
What resolution do you run at?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:19 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Screen Resolution

Hi guys.

Just want to get some feedback on what screen resolution you run at..

Most people would be 1024x768 or above, but stats show that some still run in 800x600.

For those that do still run at 800x600, please post the reasons why.. do you have bad eyesight? Do you not know how to change it?

If you're not sure how to check what resolution you're running at, right-click on the desktop and go to "Properties", then the "Settings" tab. On the bottom right side of that window you'll see the resolution. (see attached pic)

The reason i'm asking is so I can take this feedback into the redesign of the IceInSpace site.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (resolution.jpg)
21.8 KB8 views

Last edited by iceman; 29-06-2005 at 11:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:30 AM
xstream's Avatar
xstream (John)
Grey Nomad

xstream is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: "Where ever the wind blows".
Posts: 5,694
1280 x 1024 here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:31 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
1024x768....

for those running 800x600 because of text size try running 1024x768 and clicking view then going to text size and picking a larger size text
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:32 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
1280x1024. don't ya just love 19" screens
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:34 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
no... I had a 21" and it was a pain. it took up too much room and was so heavey the desk now has a permanent bow to it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:37 AM
BC
Registered User

BC is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Beach NSW
Posts: 214
1920 x 1200 here. Just took delivery of my new 24" flat screen. Is this called resolution fever?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:37 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
No ving a computer monitor , not a TV (flat screen any way ) Actually I hooked my Laptop up to the plasma the other night. Now THATS a computer screen
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:49 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
I was actually quite glad when the 21" died.... I now have a entirely reasonable 17"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-06-2005, 11:53 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Holy cow BC! Nice! I have a 21" at home, it's great for online games But ving's right, it's reallllly heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-06-2005, 12:13 PM
Jonathan
Registered User

Jonathan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 442
1280 x 1024 on a 19" monitor both at work and at home. It is a bit big at home, takes up too much of the desk.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-06-2005, 12:14 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
1280x1024 here on a 19" LCD. Its not heavy and doesnt take up much desk space!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-06-2005, 12:40 PM
Librarian64's Avatar
Librarian64
Registered User

Librarian64 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Young, NSW
Posts: 34
1280 x 1024 (19 inch monitor) at home. 1024 x768 at smaller work monitors.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-06-2005, 01:13 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving
1024x768....

for those running 800x600 because of text size try running 1024x768 and clicking view then going to text size and picking a larger size text
Thats OK for the main text but popups are still small text though.
Ive only a 14" monitor and the 800x600 is the most comfortable to use.
Unless there's more options ????
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-06-2005, 01:41 PM
mch62's Avatar
mch62 (Mark)
Registered User

mch62 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glenore Grove Queensland
Posts: 649
1280 x 1024 @100Hz on a 22"CRT.
medium text size.

Last edited by mch62; 29-06-2005 at 01:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-06-2005, 01:46 PM
Nightshift
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Warning : This is a bit of a rant.
As IT manager for a six campus TAFE Institute here on the Sunshine coast, and.... Ex Service Manager for Samsung Australia (the largest Korean Manufacturer of CRT picture tubes and second largest tube manufacturer in the world, if you dont believe me take the back off your TV) let me give you some technical background.
LCD or Plasma screens are marketing hype, mostly, yes they look sexy and the colours can be vibrant but the dot pitch resolution and the way that they colour converge leaves them looking pretty ordinary at high resolutions against a good quality CRT at one tenth the price. In short, if you are serious about high end graphic output and you work all day at your PC then buy a good CRT, if you want to impress your friends and have the latest technology but not necessarily the best image then but a LCD, weight and size should have NOTHING to do with it, buy a bigger desk if required but dont buy garbage becasue your desk wont cater for the good stuff. Now as for resolution, 1024 X 768 is the chosen resolution of most Govt agencies (including this one) and most web developers as it is the optimum resolution for web sites to be developed, 800 X 600 if your near blind and as high as your video card will allow if your in to graphics. Remember that displaying an image is not the same thing as generating it, that is a function of your video card and you can have a 50" monitor if you want but your $24.95 video card will let you down. Then comes the whole question of animation and resolution, ie. Gaming or video production, lets not go there, as you can see it is quite a complex issue and like buying a telescope, should be looked at holistically not just based on wow factor. For what its worth, I started in the computer game in 1983 and we had 320 X 200 (CGA) 8 colour screens if we were lucky and mono (Green or amber) high resolution 640 X 480 if we were not. Cheers, Dennis.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-06-2005, 01:51 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Nice post Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-06-2005, 01:56 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
like your signature says hey?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-06-2005, 02:11 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Good post dennis, I think you're saying "forget slice of heaven, develop it for 1024x768 and be done with it"
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-06-2005, 02:21 PM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
Good post dennis, I think you're saying "forget slice of heaven, develop it for 1024x768 and be done with it"
Yeah I agree.
Dont stop progress on my behalf, I might finally get rid of this tincan and piece of string setup with a gameboy sized screen and get modern.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29-06-2005, 02:38 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
800 x 600 here.

When I tried to enlarge the size it goes off centre and you can only see 75% of the page!

So, 800 x 600 is the best I can get.

Also Mike, the way you said to check by right click on desktop etc doesn't work on my pooter. I had to go into 'Desktop' then 'My Computer' then 'Control Panel' then 'Display' then 'Settings'. Long way round but I got there.

By the way, my monitor is 13" diagonally! (10.5" across, 8" high)

Last edited by ballaratdragons; 29-06-2005 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement