Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 21-10-2007, 12:36 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Helix with Baader narrowband o3 filter

Did this tonight, lots of moonlight about.
Only did 2x10 mins, was curious to see what it would look like using the o3 filter. Would look better with more exposures. This is where monochrome Astro CCD cameras come in handy as they get all the pixels, wheeras I was only getting green and a little bit of blue.
Scott

EDIT oops might help if I post the image
here it is
Scott
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (helix2x10minso400 o3 10inch.jpg)
109.8 KB52 views

Last edited by tornado33; 24-10-2007 at 02:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-10-2007, 12:42 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
look better if we could see the image lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-10-2007, 02:37 AM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
I agree with the OP, it would look substantially better with more exposures

I am eager to see this one, as I have one of these on order.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-10-2007, 06:58 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
its a little dark i feel. color balance however i cant fault,no noise present, interesting composition though .did you dark subtract this, one should also consider flats and a bias to improve this particular image

good to see

having a chuckle at your expense
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-10-2007, 09:06 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
Hey Scott - Umm, I thing the moon glow was a bit too much for you............
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-10-2007, 06:28 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
are you fellows seriously suggesting you cant see it?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-10-2007, 07:12 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
if I squint whilst standing on my head I think I can make it out.

Man the suspense is killing me..... cant wait to see it now..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-10-2007, 07:18 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
What they all are saying is --------------------->>>>> a picture or link would be nice.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-10-2007, 07:21 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
When sleepy it is not a good idea to post a picture it could turn out blank
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 24-10-2007, 02:45 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
image posted now
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-10-2007, 08:50 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Nice image Scott, is it the OIII filter that gives it the ghostly appearance.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-10-2007, 08:59 PM
citivolus's Avatar
citivolus (Ric)
Refracted

citivolus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carindale
Posts: 1,178
I agree that with a colour camera and an emission filter that you are only getting light on 1/3 of the pixels. I wonder if it would make a difference in processing at all to convert it as b&w and then drop the red and blue channels?

Edit: RGB cameras are what, rggb these days? In that case, it would be half the pixels.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-10-2007, 10:29 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by citivolus View Post
I agree that with a colour camera and an emission filter that you are only getting light on 1/3 of the pixels. I wonder if it would make a difference in processing at all to convert it as b&w and then drop the red and blue channels?

Edit: RGB cameras are what, rggb these days? In that case, it would be half the pixels.
Actually thats how I process monochrome pics with narrowband filters. With red HA filters I delete the green and blue channels (and the noise that accompanies them) as theres no signal to speak of. With the O3 shot, however there is about 1/2 the signal in blue as is green, so I reduce the blue by 50%, green 100%, red is completely deleted.

technically the colour digicams are indeed rggb
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter

more green then red or blue pixels

This sensor type sounds like a good design, but sadly doesnt yet seem to outpace current DSLR sensors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 25-10-2007, 05:30 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Good effort for 20 mins worth of narrowband data. Perhaps triple the exposure next time to see a better result.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement