Crux widefield 12-06-05

[1ponders] (Paul) · #1 13-06-2005, 09:46 PM

Canon 300D FL 120mm ISO400 260, 600 and 780 sec, dark subed, stacked in imagestaker. Stacked images and originals restacked in Reg 3. Histogram stretch in Reg 3. Levels adjusted in PS.

h0ughy (David) · #2 13-06-2005, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [1ponders]

Canon 300D FL 120mm ISO400 260, 600 and 780 sec, dark subed, stacked in imagestaker. Stacked images and originals restacked in Reg 3. Histogram stretch in Reg 3. Levels adjusted in PS.

mate, the only thing you left out of this one was the twin turbo double overhead cam foxtails!!!!

great shot.

[1ponders] (Paul) · #3 13-06-2005, 09:52 PM

Thanks h0ughy

Don't know where the slight redishness came from though. It wasn't there in the full size original

mick pinner · #4 13-06-2005, 09:55 PM

very very artistic. l like it.

h0ughy (David) · #5 13-06-2005, 09:55 PM

no worries! one day, just one day I might be brave enough to try something like that.

atalas · #6 13-06-2005, 10:26 PM

Paul very nice shot!

Louie

Daring Dave · #7 13-06-2005, 10:37 PM

Top shot there Paul..

I was tryng the exact same thing last night ..jewel box..but tried using my Canon 700i mini DV camera and dob ....Not much luck using my home made adapter but its getting there...

beren · #8 14-06-2005, 01:23 AM

Wow beautiful shot Paul thats stunning

ballaratdragons (Ken) · #9 14-06-2005, 01:57 AM

Excellent Paul!

There is no Red showing up on my monitor! Unless you mean the slight Dark Burgundy colouring in the far left area of the pic.

Dennis · #10 14-06-2005, 04:45 AM

Stunning image Paul - well done. Is your 300D modified, or is it "au naturel"?

Cheers

Dennis

iceman (Mike) · #11 14-06-2005, 06:21 AM

Really nice shot Paul! Did you attach the cam to your new mount?

How did you find that imagestacker program to use?

[1ponders] (Paul) · #12 14-06-2005, 08:16 AM

Thanks everyone. Non modified Canon. The image stacker was a piece of cake. If all you want to do is add stack or average images I found it great. I'll be hanging on to that one.

This was just piggy back to my celestron refractor which I used as a guidescope on top of the Losmandy

seeker372011 (Narayan) · #13 14-06-2005, 09:08 AM

very nice!

Orion · #14 14-06-2005, 06:46 PM

Your pics are certainly getting better by the week Paul. Keep them coming.

ving (David) · #15 14-06-2005, 06:57 PM

Nice sackage Paul

hmm... is sackage a word?
great shot tho

[1ponders] (Paul) · #16 14-06-2005, 07:20 PM

Thanks vingage

ving (David) · #17 14-06-2005, 07:21 PM

more like "vintage"

gbeal · #18 15-06-2005, 06:06 AM

Hey nice shot Paul, told you the tracking was easier with this. Whats next?

CometGuy · #19 15-06-2005, 07:42 PM

Paul,

Thats a great shot! What lens/f ration were you using?

Terry

[1ponders] (Paul) · #20 15-06-2005, 09:18 PM

Thanks Terry, must be a pat on the back session. I've just been over raving and asking same questions about your lagoon wide field.

I used a standard Canon 35-80mm Zoom. (from my old EOS500) f/6.3 Now Someone is going to say something here I'm sure. I said 120mm focal length up the top and I'm still not sure about this but the advice I've been given is to multiply you lens FL by 1.5 when using the 300D (true/false)