Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:06 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
M17 - ED80 on new EQ5

Hi All,
Tues night had to go and pick up wife from friends - left scope and camera firing off 30 sec shots. Expected to be gone 10-15mins...ended up 2 hours!!!
So I had 76 30 sec pics of M17 @ iso800.!!!!!!!!!!

Decided to get a coffee and start stacking in ImagesPlus.
Attached is the result.
Is there a law of diminishing returns with stacked images?
Expected more data as this should be the equivalent of a 38min exposures!!
Had to do my usual ham-fisted processing techniques to bring out the detail!
Cheers...
Doug
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M17-LOW-copy-3.jpg)
135.7 KB99 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:22 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Looks alright to me Doug. Looks pretty smooth on my monitor, if a bit dark, but you can't expect wonders for only 30 sec intergrations. The advantages of stacking that many images is a strong increase in the Signal/noise ratio so your image looks cleaner.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:23 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Doug you could try summing sets of images. With 76 images you could try summing every tenth say 1,11, 21 etc and then 2,,12,22 etc these six or seven summed images could then be median averaged to minimise noise. If you sum seven images it would be eqivalent to 7x30 sec exposure.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:25 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Thanks Paul,
Ended up playing around with the compressed jpeg before posting so it's a bit rougher than the TIFF (excuses x2)
Just wondered if like reciprocity(!?) in film there is a point where stacking images makes little or no difference?
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:26 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
Doug you could try summing sets of images. With 76 images you could try summing every tenth say 1,11, 21 etc and then 2,,12,22 etc these six or seven summed images could then be median averaged to minimise noise. If you sum seven images it would be eqivalent to 7x30 sec exposure.

Bert
Good onya Bert, I'd forgotten all about that technique seeing as most of us go for as long as we can without light polluting our images too much.

That is right Doug, plus the summing will also increase your bit depth as well, though only modestly with only sums of 7 to 10 images. When summing try a setting that prevents sigma clipping so your stars don't go max out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:30 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Also... is the texture/detail in the Nebula an artefact of processing or actual detail!?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:33 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Bit hard to tell on my crappy screen. Can you post a jpeged version of the unprocessed stack and an unprocessed jpeged single original shot?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:33 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
Good onya Bert, I'd forgotten all about that technique seeing as most of us go for as long as we can without light polluting our images too much.

That is right Doug, plus the summing will also increase your bit depth as well, though only modestly with only sums of 7 to 10 images. When summing try a setting that prevents sigma clipping so your stars don't go max out.
To be clear...
I stack images 1,11,21,31 etc, save as image#1. then stack 2,22,32 etc,save as image #2 - then when I've got 7 images - I stack those 7?
Please advise
Cheers
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:35 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Yes but your stacking needs to be a sum/addition not an average or median. The resulting 7 images can then be average or median combined for a final shot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:38 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
Bit hard to tell on my crappy screen. Can you post a jpeged version of the unprocessed stack and an unprocessed jpeged single original shot?
Can post a jpeg of the stack but no single shots - binned them

ps isn't the 200kb upload change dreamy!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (CombineFilesAdpAdd.jpg)
187.3 KB41 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:39 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders] View Post
Yes but your stacking needs to be a sum/addition not an average or median. The resulting 7 images can then be average or median combined for a final shot.
thanks Paul - understood
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:41 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugnsuz View Post
Also... is the texture/detail in the Nebula an artefact of processing or actual detail!?
Probably best that I don't know Paul!!!
Don't want to spoil the dream!
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:44 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
The other advantage Doug is that there is always a bit of drift and rotation depending how good your EQ alignment is. By summing every tenth image say, your are not summing noise in exactly the same position on the image. Median combining then gets rid of any that is left.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:45 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
What I've got to do is learn to drift align so that I can break the 30 second barrier - just wish the Camera could take 60sec exposures in Manual mode, but 30 secs is the max on the Pentax.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:47 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk View Post
The other advantage Doug is that there is always a bit of drift and rotation depending how good your EQ alignment is. By summing every tenth image say, your are not summing noise in exactly the same position on the image. Median combining then gets rid of any that is left.

Bert
Thanks for the tips Bert - my next project is perfecting polar alignment.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:50 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Looks mighty fine to me Doug!!!!

I've never seen that Nebula before! Wow!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:51 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons View Post
Looks mighty fine to me Doug!!!!

I've never seen that Nebula before! Wow!
Not like that anyway Ken!!!
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:52 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
ahhhhhh, I just went and looked it up.

It's the Swan Nebula!!!!!!! Oops, sorry.

Why didn't you just say Swan Nebula in the first place
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-09-2007, 08:52 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Well I reacon you've done pretty darn good job with what you've managed to capture. I'd say the marbling could be artifacts from excessive stretching (from memory I don't think I've imaged M17 ) but you can get a good idea of how yours may have become marbled by looking at this shot http://astrim.free.fr/gallery/M17CD.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-09-2007, 09:01 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Ah, Doug, now your cooking mate, looking pretty good there, well done.

Leon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement