Yes, it was a lovely sight. I got home late (midnight) and looked up, hoping for clear skies so I could get the scope out. Transparency low, onlt a hint of brightest stars, but a full halo around the Moon - very strong! Wished I had a proper digital camera! Saw the same effect last Sunday evening up the Dandenongs. It's the right time of year for this, I guess.
You need a long exposure to photograph the halo, so that means a tripod.
It will also mean the moon itself gets overexposed.
Yes, I figured you'd need to combine two exposures. Would the halo require more exposure time then one would take without tracking - but I guess the diffuse nature of it means a little bit of "trailing" wouldn't be a problem?
You definitely wouldn't need tracking. I imagine the halo would only require an exposure of 2-8 seconds, depending on the ISO used.
Also given that the exposure requires a short focal length lens, you won't see any trailing for at least 15 seconds on a fixed tripod.
If you wanted to combine two exposures, you'd have to do some careful blending in photoshop to blend the two layers (using selective feathering). Otherwise you could just paste the cutout of the full moon exposure over the top of where it should go in the halo exposure.
The idea is to make it not look too sharp and cutout, ie not too obviously processed.