Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-07-2007, 10:48 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
New Moon For Saturn

The latest Moon for Saturn http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6908190.stm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-07-2007, 12:55 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
60 Moons and possibly rising!!!!

Amazing stuff!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-07-2007, 12:56 AM
Gargoyle_Steve's Avatar
Gargoyle_Steve (Steve)
Space Explorer

Gargoyle_Steve is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caloundra, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,571
Jupiter is still ahead moon-wise, but for how much longer? Could Saturn overtake Jupe - quite possible with Cassini looking around in such detail.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-07-2007, 07:04 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Exactly right Steve, I'd imagine if they let an orbiter stay around Jupiter for a year or two they'd find many more small moons as well.

I'm not sure if there's any plans for a future Jupiter orbiter, perhaps they know enough about the giant planet already. I can only dream - imagine the images they'd send back of the planet and the galilean moons. The pass-by images from New Horizons were spectacular.

Cassini has been a great mission, certainly a lot to learn out there.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-07-2007, 12:38 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Exactly right Steve, I'd imagine if they let an orbiter stay around Jupiter for a year or two they'd find many more small moons as well.

I'm not sure if there's any plans for a future Jupiter orbiter, perhaps they know enough about the giant planet already. I can only dream - imagine the images they'd send back of the planet and the galilean moons. The pass-by images from New Horizons were spectacula

Cassini has been a great mission, certainly a lot to learn out there.
Wouldn't you like a seat on the next orbiter Mike but as long as they gave you a return ticket
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-07-2007, 07:07 PM
little col
gosh i love imaging

little col is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 286
could it be possible that saturn is creating its own asteroid belt system , with over 60 moons shurely this could be a possibility for the future
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-07-2007, 11:46 AM
OneOfOne's Avatar
OneOfOne (Trevor)
Meteor & fossil collector

OneOfOne is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
Eventually they will face the same problems with the definition of what constitutes a moon as the recent definition of what is a planet. How small does a moon have to be before it is considered nothing more than a rock or debris?

If they discovered a rock the size of a basketball orbiting Saturn, is it a moon? How about "dwarf moon"? What if it is the size of bus? If something the size of a bus were considered to be a moon, would that have made Skylab a temporary moon of the earth? If one of these smaller moons were to break up, which one retains the original name, the larger? Does the other bit get an "a" designation or another name? What if the two bits are bigger than some of the other small moons, would that warrant a completely new name for the smaller fragment? Hmm....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-07-2007, 12:45 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
The definition of a moon is simply something orbiting another body (and not orbiting the sun), so I don't think it matters how big or small it is.

There are asteroids that have "moons" orbiting them.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-07-2007, 01:35 PM
higginsdj's Avatar
higginsdj
A Lazy Astronomer

higginsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
Sooner or later they will have to make that call. Saturn's rings are made up of multi trillions of moons by your definition (ie anything) and I certainly wouldn't like the job of identifying or catagorising (or naming) all of them!

Most asteroid moons appear to be of a reasonable size to date (most in the 1km+ category though the NEO ones are much smaller). (http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astr...idmoons.html#2)

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-07-2007, 01:38 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
yeh you're right David - I was going to reply to my own post this morning when I was thinking about Saturn's rings..

I guess they'll have to classify it as orbiting another body but not within a ring system, maybe.

I'm sure there's thousands of small rocks orbiting Saturn and Jupiter that aren't in the ring plane but aren't classifieds as moons, either.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-07-2007, 01:47 PM
higginsdj's Avatar
higginsdj
A Lazy Astronomer

higginsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 614
LOL - whats the difference between a Rock and a Boulder?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-07-2007, 11:41 PM
GTB_an_Owl's Avatar
GTB_an_Owl (Geoff)
bewise betold neverbecold

GTB_an_Owl is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Terrigal NSW
Posts: 3,828
you can throw a rock

geoff
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-07-2007, 08:03 AM
radu5er's Avatar
radu5er
Registered User

radu5er is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ballarat, Vic
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by higginsdj View Post
LOL - whats the difference between a Rock and a Boulder?
I once visited Boulder...nice place

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-07-2007, 12:39 PM
OneOfOne's Avatar
OneOfOne (Trevor)
Meteor & fossil collector

OneOfOne is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bentleigh
Posts: 1,386
Maybe "a Moon" is something that orbits "a planet" or "dwarf planet" that has "cleared its orbit" to quote another famous definition!

But then again, what do you call something that orbits "a moon" without ending up with a circular reference! Sorry, I'm a computer programmer and I hate getting a circular reference...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement