Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-07-2007, 07:33 PM
ozstockman (Mike)
Registered User

ozstockman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kenmore Hills, Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 392
My first shot too :-)

That's my first shot too.
Taken with Canon EOS 400D(unmod) attached(prime focus) to ED80 and autoguied on EQ6 mount. It was cropped and resized.

I believe it's a single shot at ISO800 120 sec, but I have done so much processing on it, trying different methods, including stacking so I lost info where I started from :-)

I think there is still a lot of noise there but I am a newbie in image processing and still trying to figure out how I can remove it.

I would also appreciate if someone tells me what DSO it might be. The whole idea that day was to get my autoguiding setup with unmodified ToUCam working and I stopped traking where my scope pointed and tried to find any DSO with a star that unmodified webcam can see :-)


cheers,

Michael
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (dso.jpg)
82.6 KB93 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-07-2007, 07:51 PM
little col
gosh i love imaging

little col is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 286
looks like th trifid neb to me , great image ,you seem to have caught alot of detail in that and well done on that first image , focus is spot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-07-2007, 07:57 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
Michael
I think its the Lagoon nebula. I took the liberty of copying your image to try and subtract the noise.

I used Photoshop and did the following (basic process from Scott Irelands book)

1. Made a duplicate layer
2. Made a mask within the duplicate
3. Desaturated the duplicate and copied it into the mask
4. Inverted the mask and adjusted the level to be darker
5. Removed the link from the duplicate to the mask
6. Did a gaussian blur on the duplicate (about 150)
7. Flattened the image and saved as a JPEG

Its a good book - its helping me out a lot and i,m up to about page 101 theres lots of trial and error involved (more error than trial usually on my part)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Lagoon.jpg)
125.2 KB52 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-07-2007, 07:59 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
Michael
Sorry - the books called 'Photoshop Astronomy' and I have to read each page 6 times to get it right!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-07-2007, 08:05 PM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
Great first try Michael.

You've captured M8 Lagoon Nebula

David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-07-2007, 08:42 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Pretty good i reckon for a first attempt Michael, keep em coming.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-07-2007, 09:10 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Nice one, Michael.

I actually prefer your original to the reprocess.

Sorry dcalleja. You've burnt out a lot of the subtle detail and colour of the original, and the stars look 'blobby' or burnt out, IMHO

Doesn't hurt to try, though
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-07-2007, 09:36 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Great shot Michael, DSO imaging is very rewarding isn't it, you have some great data captured. One thing you could do is take more shots, the more you do the smoother the final image will be, but yes that does mean you need to stack the images. Using software such as Deepsky Stacker which is free takes alot of the processing steps out of your hands and while you sleep it could be stacking the images you took. Pretty hard smoothing out a single framed image without losing some detail. I also use a 400D and have gone down the same road not long ago, and yes I am still traveling I dont think the bus stops.

If you can use the cameras in camera noise reduction too, it takes longer but its one less step you have to worry about now. Later you can start making your own flats and dark frames to clean the image up further. Anyway I had a small fiddle with your image, this had some nice data and focus is spot on..
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (dso_lagoon_filtered.jpg)
92.8 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-07-2007, 09:51 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
Matt
Your humble opinion is spot on - the core is totally burnt out! I had another play (Michael - always fun to play with someone elses images esp when theres so much data there). I didn't get the same result (or detail) as Andrew but its not so burnt out this time.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Lagoon Attempt No 2.jpg)
122.8 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-07-2007, 10:03 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Good work, Dan. Definitely better
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-07-2007, 10:06 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
Its good work from Michael - I really want one of those Canon 400's - Xmas is coming!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-07-2007, 10:25 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
I meant good work on the reprocess

But yes, Michael's original data was good.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-07-2007, 07:21 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Great image for a single shot, Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-07-2007, 12:06 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
A very nice first image Michael. Looking forward to seeing more of your images.

Top stuff
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-07-2007, 09:25 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
I agree with the comments, very nice single exposure, good focus and guiding..now you need a bunch to stack.
keep up the work!!
cheers
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-07-2007, 04:37 PM
Dr Nick's Avatar
Dr Nick (Nick)
www.NicksAstronomy.com

Dr Nick is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Glen Innes, NSW
Posts: 574
Very nice, i love Andrews version, shows how much an image can improove by processing well.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24-07-2007, 09:19 PM
ozstockman (Mike)
Registered User

ozstockman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kenmore Hills, Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 392
Thanks guys.

I took hundreds of astro pictures before starting with Nextstar 4" SCT and then moving to ED80 mounted on EQ6 but I did not use autoguiding. Those pictures were so bad so I almost decided to quit astrophotography. However I gave it last change and could manage autoguiding to work.

Of course I still have a lot of things to learn i.e. image processing but at least now I know that I can take these great DSO pictures by myself :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement