Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek
Excellent image of M83 with only limited data , There’s just no substitute for dark skies as I image from both B8 ( 18.50 mag/arc sec 2 ) and B3 ( 21.60 mag/arcsec2 )
|
Yeah, that night I measured 21.5 M/arcsec2 in Camp Duckadang with my DIY sq-meter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek
What’s more impressive is that your humble 20kg rated EQ6-R pro mount is carrying that big steel Newt with ease by the looks of your image. Payload must be pushing close to 30kg. I have an EQ6-R in Sydney , they are just workhorses these mounts.
Mine only carries an 8” f5 Carbon newt so payload only around 13kg.
As a matter of interest what were your guiding numbers that evening ?
Cheers
Martin
|
Just weighed the telescope and the "imaging head" (camera, filter wheel, coma corrector and off-axis guider assembled).
The tube is 19.6 kg, and the imaging head is 1.65 kg, making a total of 21.25 kg—just barely exceeding the recommended load capacity (ooops. not actually, as I weighed it without the tube rings which are pretty heavy).
Anyway, balancing all of this requires 30 kg of counterweights, so the load is truly extreme for this mount.
But here, the main factor isn't the weight, it’s the tube's wind resistance.
As long as everything is properly balanced and there are no sudden gusts of wind, the guiding performance is good, with an RMS of around 0.4-0.5" on both axes. Just like that night, and the FWHM was about 2" on best frames.
I hope I won’t be torturing the EQ6R with this tube for too long. I’m currently building a large mount that will handle this telescope without counterweights, along with me sitting on top of it!


I’ll be starting a thread about it soon.