Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-03-2025, 09:48 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 970
M83

This new moon has been pretty kind to me, and I have got out to take photos a decent chunk of nights.

Here is my go at a natural looking m83.

https://app.astrobin.com/i/9szd1i
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2025, 11:14 PM
FrancoRodriguez (Franco)
Franco

FrancoRodriguez is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Ramsay, SE QLD
Posts: 116
beautiful shot and excellent colours. Congratulations!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2025, 10:31 PM
xiongz (Zonghou Xiong)
Registered User

xiongz is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 31
Great shot. I noticed that you primarily took RGB subs instead of L. My understanding was that for LRGB images L channel should contain far more details because, without colour filters, L channel was about 2-3 times more sensitive. Usually I would do at least 1(L):1(R+G+B), even much more L than RGB total. My 2 cents. John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2025, 06:20 PM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,690
Peter,
Lovely image of M83 and Starfield colour looks great too
Well done !!
I kind of agree with John , for broadband imaging , LRGB will ( in most cases ) provide a better result with more fine detail than just RGB, more so under darker skies too. My processing software Startools even creates a Synthetic Luminance from the RGB data to add to the raw Luminance data to provide more image fidelity.
I’ve just started my M83 project under my B8 super heavy light polluted Sydney as M83 is going to hang around for quite a few months.
For broadband imaging during New Moon in Sydney, I’m limited to 30 sec subs with my 8”f5 Carbon Newt ( FL 1050mm ) and ZWO2600MM ( -10C Gain 0 )
I’ve only gathered a tiny bit of data so far ( about an hour or so of Luminance only )
I will need as a minimum, at least 3 to 4 hours of Luminance and 2 or 3 hours each of RGB ( minimum 12 hours ) to combat the horrible LP gradient.
Attached is my image of M83 with 1 hour of Luminance 30 sec subs with limited processing , mainly gradient removal , some sharpening and denoise and also an image of just an AutoDev screen stretch to show gradients. Apart from the noisy image due to lack of data SNR , the minimal Luminance data ( just over an hour ) did provide some half decent detail. If I used 1 hour of Red or 1hour of Green or 1 hour of Blue , it definitely would not compete with Luminance with respect to fine detail.

It would be nice to see your image with say 6 hours of Luminance added , I think you would expose more of the outer arms plus core region.
Anyway you maybe happy just to capture RGB due to time restrictions or other personal reasons ??

I initially started with just RGB for broadband and only early last year changed that to LRGB and now it’s mostly Ha LRGB.

Clear Skies
Martin
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83 Southern Pinwheel Galaxy 131 x 30sec subs Crop.jpg)
190.5 KB47 views
Click for full-size image (M83 Southern Pinwheel Galaxy Just AutoDev Sceen Stretch Crop.jpg)
198.4 KB41 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement