sadly I see such pictures always inverse in relief,
insteed of a depression I see an elevation,
there are somebody also afflicted with that phenomenon?
fragt Ispom
Funny, when I first viewed the image I saw a depression, now it's an elevation. I've found that if I think about which direction the light is coming from then it seems to have the correct perspective.
It is not suffering form faulty operation of the brains ..
Simply, we are not getting enough information (both eyes are receiving the same image, no 3rd dimension info is present), so brain tries to interprete what's available, based on experience.
Try to rotate image 180 degrees, it works for me (sometimes) :-)
It is not suffering form faulty operation of the brains ..
Simply, we are not getting enough information (both eyes are receiving the same image, no 3rd dimension info is present), so brain tries to interprete what's available, based on experience.
Try to rotate image 180 degrees, it works for me (sometimes) :-)
well, bojan, I've tried it and so it works !
rotate 180 degrees and enlarge,
and I'll see the landscape like in reality,
but if the picture rotates back,
the relief is wrong again
Wierd how the light seems to stop abruptly only a few metres into the hole, rather than showing a fading shadow dissappearing down a shaft. Its almost like the ground is only a shelf over a large cavernous area only a few metres under the shelf.
Wierd how the light seems to stop abruptly only a few metres into the hole, rather than showing a fading shadow dissappearing down a shaft. Its almost like the ground is only a shelf over a large cavernous area only a few metres under the shelf.
That's the conclusion they have come to - there is significant overhang - on the sunlit side, for sure. Go inot the article and pull up the highest resolution image - it's an amazingly black void!
That's the conclusion they have come to - there is significant overhang - on the sunlit side, for sure. Go inot the article and pull up the highest resolution image - it's an amazingly black void!
I did Eric, that's where I noticed it the most.
I did a graphic to explain what I mean.
It seems to be like a shelved void (on the right) rather than a shaft (left)
I did a graphic to explain what I mean.
It seems to be like a shelved void (on the right) rather than a shaft (left)
Sorry Ken, I missed the point you made. I agree that the overhang must be substantial - any volunteers to stand near the edge? Let's hope the rovers (if they are still mobile?) don't encounter one - don't think they carry parachutes!
Sorry Ken, I missed the point you made. I agree that the overhang must be substantial - any volunteers to stand near the edge? Let's hope the rovers (if they are still mobile?) don't encounter one - don't think they carry parachutes!
!
