Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-05-2023, 11:57 PM
nikanj (Andy)
Registered User

nikanj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 16
WO Redcat 61

I just saw this new scope pop up on the Testar homepage.

https://williamoptics.com/redcat-61



Looks like WO have addressed the main complaint about the Redcat scopes and replaced the helical focuser with focus knobs while still keeping it internal focus.

The price seems a bit too high for a 61mm APO though. It costs the same as a Redcat 71.


What are everyone's thoughts? Will you be ordering one when the land in Australia?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-05-2023, 08:54 AM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,225
Their MIFD range are certainly interesting and look to be a way of curing any optical path distortion as the focuser moves.

Just a shame they are insanely expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-05-2023, 10:13 AM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,476
It is the same specs in terms of field of view and aperture as the askar 300 the askar is a quintuplet and has beautiful optics (biased view) this one should be right up there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-05-2023, 01:44 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,159
300mm focal length seems a better focal length than 350. Not quite wide enough for the use of a scope like this. It's a widefield imaging scope.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2023, 04:41 PM
nikanj (Andy)
Registered User

nikanj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 16
The FRA300 is a traditional quintuplet where the Redcat is a 4-element Petzval meaning you don't have to worry about precise backspacing. Internal focus is also a good nice-to-have.

But yeah I'd imaging they'd produce very similar results optically so are these quality of life bonuses really worth the price premium. I'll be keeping an eye out for sample images in the coming weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2023, 04:51 PM
Nikolas's Avatar
Nikolas (Nik)
Dazed and confused

Nikolas is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikanj View Post
The FRA300 is a traditional quintuplet where the Redcat is a 4-element Petzval meaning you don't have to worry about precise backspacing. Internal focus is also a good nice-to-have.

But yeah I'd imaging they'd produce very similar results optically so are these quality of life bonuses really worth the price premium. I'll be keeping an eye out for sample images in the coming weeks.
The FRA is not backspace specific I don't know where you got that idea.
It is 100% a PETZVAL quintuplet
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2023, 10:45 PM
nikanj (Andy)
Registered User

nikanj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolas View Post
The FRA is not backspace specific I don't know where you got that idea.
It is 100% a PETZVAL quintuplet

Oops my mistake. Must have confused it with the Sharpstar refractors.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2023, 06:27 AM
RugbyRene (Rene)
Registered User

RugbyRene is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 349
Buy the FRA300 and save yourself $1000 to spend on something else. Spending the extra $1000 on the Redcat won’t make your images $1000 better.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement