When I compare the total RMS error figures I get in PHD2 to other NEQ6 users mine are significantly better. My NEQ6 is unmodified and I see a typical total RMS error of around 0.5-0.6 arc seconds with values as low as 0.3 arc seconds when seeing is good. Stars are always nice and round except for very slight strangeness in the corners which I'm 90% sure is from either back focus distance or tilt and not tracking. The results are so good it makes me suspicious I've messed up the settings in PHD2.
PHD2 automatically loaded the pixel size/scale for my ASI120MM guide camera so I assume that's correct. I inputted my focal length as 600mm as I'm using an OAG on a 800mm Netwonian with a 0.75x reducer (Starizon Nexus).
The only complaint I have is that I have significant DEC backlash so DEC can spike as high as 1.5 total RMS error before recovering. I'd like to belt mod and hypertune my NEQ6 but at the same time I'm afraid of messing up a good thing.
What do you all think? Are these results legitimate or did I mess up the settings somewhere? Should I hypertune my NEQ6 or just leave it as is and perhaps fiddle with the DEC pressure?
Here are some screenshots of my guiding graph and PHD2 Guiding Assistant output for reference.
https://i.imgur.com/2hEm2fJ.png
https://i.imgur.com/kN5QNgM.png