Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-02-2022, 07:54 PM
Tony Leece's Avatar
Tony Leece
Registered User

Tony Leece is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenwood Perth Western Australia
Posts: 329
C80 Rework

Re ran the Omega centauri data i took on the 3rd today with darks and bias frames.
De ovalised some of those horrible stars and tried to pull some of the colours out too.
I didn't need to crop the image as much either.
I hope this looks better

10" SW newt
SW AZEQ6 pro
zwo533 mc pro 61 x 60 second frames at -5
Baader ir/uv cut filter
asi air v1


Click image for larger version

Name:	iis sized colour adjusted  omega centauri.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	141.5 KB
ID:	286570
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2022, 10:24 PM
Stephane's Avatar
Stephane
Registered User

Stephane is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 528
That’s a lovely glob Tony. I have never yet imaged a globular cluster. This one looks very sharp and has some colour.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2022, 10:56 PM
Tony Leece's Avatar
Tony Leece
Registered User

Tony Leece is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenwood Perth Western Australia
Posts: 329
Thanks Stephane, i have only imaged it twice with this camera and rushed the processing both times as you can see with my earlier post
I have a habit of trying to get something looking ok as fast as possible
Thanks again mate
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2022, 11:38 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Why did you have to crop it at all? Globs, especially Omega C. look much better when the image includes many surrounding stars. The image is a bit saturated brightness wise, which masks the fact that globs are made up of
a large percentage of old red stars. Here's an example of what I mean.
This image is 8 x 30secs 8" Newt. with DSLR.
Incidentally, if your darks are of the same duration as your lights, you don't
need bias frames, as darks contain bias data.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (5139 sharpen 2 irf.jpg)
179.5 KB25 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2022, 03:07 AM
Tony Leece's Avatar
Tony Leece
Registered User

Tony Leece is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenwood Perth Western Australia
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
Why did you have to crop it at all? Globs, especially Omega C. look much better when the image includes many surrounding stars. The image is a bit saturated brightness wise, which masks the fact that globs are made up of
a large percentage of old red stars. Here's an example of what I mean.
This image is 8 x 30secs 8" Newt. with DSLR.
Incidentally, if your darks are of the same duration as your lights, you don't
need bias frames, as darks contain bias data.
raymo
i usually get stacking artifacts as i don't guide yet and the images wander a bit. this is not cropped very much at all,less than 20 pixels on the bottom and left side i think. Yes i totally agree its missing more red stars and is over saturated, i will try to watch that in the future mate i love your image btw.
and thanks for the info on bias frames, there are so many types of calibration frames i get confused
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2022, 03:14 AM
Tony Leece's Avatar
Tony Leece
Registered User

Tony Leece is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenwood Perth Western Australia
Posts: 329
This more what you had in mind bro?

Click image for larger version

Name:	iis sized colour adjusted  omega centauri 2 more red.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	153.4 KB
ID:	286577
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2022, 01:01 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Yep, that's better. Your image looks dull; I don't know if it is the filter or what, but O.C. is very bright, in your face if you know what I mean. It has a
sort of lilac/blue tint, but should be a bit whiter to be true to how it looks visually.
Excuse the stars in my ancient image, was done without a coma corrector.
raymo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement