ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent
12.5%
21-08-2018, 06:56 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 227
Guiding
Hi guys. I’ve had my autoguiding gear for a week or two now and I don’t seem to be having issue with it. In fact it’s one thing I can say so far that seemed fairly easy.
I just thought I’d check that I’m doing it right. The attached are pictures of my graph and my numbers. Do these look OK to everyone? Are the numbers acceptable or should I make some changes. They’ve been roughly the same every night but this is about as low as I can get them.
Still haven’t done any darks for phd2 yet.
Attached Thumbnails
161.4 KB 47 views
149.0 KB 43 views
21-08-2018, 07:03 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 60
I can't see all of the settings in phd2, but that looks about right.
You might want to change the scale a bit on the y axis. That scale makes it look better than it really is.
Are your subs coming out alright? round stars?
21-08-2018, 07:08 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 227
Yeah subs look ok as far as guiding/tracking goes. Can you tell if its working well from the numbers?
21-08-2018, 07:10 PM
Evan Morris
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gunnedah, NSW
Posts: 250
Hi Gavin, I also like to use the Star Target display as it shows me how much the star is jumping around and helps me narrow down any issues.
Another suggestion is to try changing your graph so it displays Arc-seconds instead of pixels (px). Depends on what format you like though. I think you can change it via the settings button above the RMS error values to the left of your graph.
21-08-2018, 07:27 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Agree, change the scale on the graph, the present one could be hiding a lot. However, all that really matters is, are your stars round?
21-08-2018, 07:48 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 227
Here’s the graph with a smaller scale. Also I think it’s already in arc seconds.
Attached Thumbnails
74.0 KB 34 views
110.9 KB 38 views
108.1 KB 34 views
21-08-2018, 08:07 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kyneton
Posts: 840
I’d try some longer exposures.....somewhere between 2-4 seconds
21-08-2018, 09:03 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 227
Ok I’ll give that a try. So what number should I be aiming for? I take it it’s the “Tot” number I should be using?
21-08-2018, 09:31 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kyneton
Posts: 840
My advice...forget numbers, forget graphs.
Look at your final picture. Are the stars round? If yes, your graph is fine.
There is no one size fits all due to different imaging scales.
21-08-2018, 09:42 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Sydney
Posts: 227
Ok cool well I think my stars are pretty round. Running a 30 min sub at the moment so I’ll check that one.
22-08-2018, 01:02 AM
Unregistered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,164
As Jon said, increase the exposure time (next to Stop button) from 1sec to 2-4 seconds. Otherwise you may be chasing the seeing.
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:03 AM .