Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-12-2017, 12:21 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
A decade ago

Here is where I was 10 years ago.
Manual guiding no idea of processing
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=24967
Nine minutes manually guiding. Tuff. Didnot have I clue but I remember how hard guiding was.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-12-2017, 02:42 AM
PCH's Avatar
PCH (Paul)
Registered User

PCH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 2,313
Good one Alex.

Some of the names in the thread replies stirred up fond memories too. I remember the vast knowledge of Omaroo and the often fiery and always helpful contributions by Ken James (Ballaratdragons). Shame they left the forum!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-12-2017, 05:45 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Pretty darn good for manual guiding. Your hands must have been steady in those days. I can make out a few RA and Dec crosses on the brighter stars but heck they could be diffraction spikes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-12-2017, 08:03 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
Wow Alex, nine minutes hand guiding would seem like an eternity.
I remember standing next to my rig waiting for 6 minute exposures and that was auto guiding, time really goes slow.
Excellent work Alex.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-12-2017, 08:17 AM
Imme (Jon)
Registered User

Imme is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kyneton
Posts: 840
That's a really interesting post Alex, especially the comments.
I think it would have been good to post just the pic as if it had been taken last night and compare comments getting back then to now.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-12-2017, 08:58 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I think I was the first advocate of short subs when I started to use deep sky stacker, I recall posting encouragement that using 30 sec subs anyone could do it.
The amp glow was so bad with the old canon 300d you would crop about15% from the right side, dark frames were rarely used by me, processing was do a twiddle with contrast and brightness, adjust colour and give it a sharpen up all in photoshop.
I am getting excited. I have decided to take the eq6 and the 8 inch up North and hopefully give it a go without manual guiding, and see if all I did years ago help now.
But reading my deep sky posts from 10 years ago certainly brought back memories both of how primative I was (well the game was generally as most were starting out) and the old faces who sadly are no longer here.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-12-2017, 09:56 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=25073

A 1100 second manual guiding.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-12-2017, 03:16 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
Well Done Alex ....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-12-2017, 04:12 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Thanks all.
And a decade ago many of us were just starting out even Mike was starting out because he only had 25 years experience back then.

But looking back through my old posts and photos I remember the huge effort, both thru ignorance and the quality of the gear.
And guiding you could hardly see the star in the illuminated reticle trying to balance it in the lit cross hair, after a while your head seemed to start to spin.
Hopefully I can ease back in and not put the axe into anything misbehaving.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-12-2017, 05:16 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Did the vibrations from the dinosaurs stomping about make guiding harder, Alex?

Back in the good 'ol days I built a barn door mount driven by a floppy drive stepper motor and attached my film camera to it (Olympus OM-2n.) It was fun but the images were mediocre at best. We're spoiled rotten with the technology that's available now

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-12-2017, 05:46 PM
PeterM
Registered User

PeterM is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,998
Good thread to read Alex,
For me 10 years ago was my SN discovery 2008fa in NGC6722 and basically the beginnings of BOSS which as of last Friday has a tally of 175 discoveries with Pat Pearl making his first discovery for the team in NGC2297 (AT2017ixh).
Here also are some names we don't see anymore.
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...light=sn2008fa
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-12-2017, 06:55 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Alex, it is interesting to note that you used to use the reticle's cross hairs when guiding, whereas I used to defocus the guide star until it exactly filled
the inner circle in my reticle eyepiece, and found it easy[but tedious, of course] to keep the star centred.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-12-2017, 06:57 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymo View Post
Alex, it is interesting to note that you used to use the reticle's cross hairs when guiding, whereas I used to defocus the guide star until it exactly filled
the inner circle in my reticle eyepiece, and found it easy[but tedious, of course] to keep the star centred.
raymo
Great idea.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-12-2017, 08:13 PM
doppler's Avatar
doppler (Rick)
Registered User

doppler is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mackay
Posts: 1,690
A decade ago I was just making my first few steps into the digital astro photography world, with a point and shoot camera through the eyepiece. One of my first attempts then was the 2006 transit of mercury. The digital era certainly has made astro photography fun again and much easier to get results than the old 35mm film.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (mercury transit 9.30am.jpg)
176.6 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 20-12-2017, 11:47 PM
taminga16's Avatar
taminga16 (Greg)
Registered User

taminga16 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maldon. VIC
Posts: 858
A decade ago I was content sitting in a deck chair armed with a pair of 10 X 50 Bino's until I stumbled across an article by Barry Armistead which led me to here.
The journey has been wonderful.
Gregory.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21-12-2017, 06:30 AM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
For me the same. I made astrophotos by manual tracking of an 80mm scope as guidescope.
Just peering through the guide eyepiece for 10 minutes or more for ... one single frame.

Some of my pics of 1988-1997, using a Canon T90.

https://www.skysurfer.eu/skypics_early.php
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 21-12-2017, 10:12 PM
GrahamL's Avatar
GrahamL
pro lumen

GrahamL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ballina
Posts: 3,265
10 years ago the bathroom scales were 10 kgs closer to zero
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 22-12-2017, 06:32 PM
Boozlefoot's Avatar
Boozlefoot
SQM 21.98 mag./arc sec2

Boozlefoot is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: As far from Suburbia as practical
Posts: 452
I recommend a competition. Hand guiding only. Those more committed will produce results rather than those with the larger pockets! Back to basics!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23-12-2017, 05:01 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I have just been reading some old astronomy magazines...one has an article by David (Houghey) on Duckerdang and inthe same mag prizes for the Marlin awards showing some memorable faces including Mike S for a wonderful Eagle Neb.
alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement