Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-12-2006, 06:02 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
1st deep space pics

A few weeks ago i got a few new toys, namely a 10" LX200R, a 3.3FR, and a DSI PRO camera. I've done some planetary/solar imaging before with my ETX90 (I'm still cursing that small sunspot I thought was mercury ) but I've never tried deep space.

Most of these images are just getting to know my way around my new equipment, but I think I have some potential All images are alt/az and unguided (got some mounting rings / counterweight system on the way so I can stick my etx there for now). I also forgot to take some flats so I had to use photoshop magic wand took to remove dust motes

*Saturn nebula (1st target I shot at F10 making sure my DSI worked). Couldn't image the 'ears' without saturating the central nebula.

*M79 (using 3.3FR)

*NGC1535 (using F3.3 FR, 150% enlarged in photoshop)

-Andrew
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (saturn nebula.jpg)
83.1 KB39 views
Click for full-size image (m79.jpg)
73.7 KB47 views
Click for full-size image (ngc1535_BW.jpg)
24.8 KB46 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2006, 06:52 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Geez, if you can get them that good unguided, imagine what you can do when you're fully set up!
How long were your exposures?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2006, 06:56 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Not bad mate.... My first DSI attempt didn't result in even one recognisable image! There's a learning curve here, welcome aboard!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2006, 06:57 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
I was trying all different exposure lengths using autostar suite to stack em, I seemed to get best results with <15 second exposures. I think the saturn nebula one was 1 second exposures (100 frames), M79 was 8 or 15 second exposures (only about 10 stacked) and NGC1535 was 8 seconds (again about 10 stacked).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2006, 07:01 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmodium
Not bad mate.... My first DSI attempt didn't result in even one recognisable image! There's a learning curve here, welcome aboard!
Thanks My first night out with the 3.3FR I couldn't evenm get it to focus, I stuck on all the extenders and though "oh no! not enough length!!" then the next day I realised I had too much length The software learning curve is even more intimidating! All fun though
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2006, 07:56 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,791
Nice going Kal, you should have seen my first attemt, but then again maybe you shouldn't see it, your on your way.

Cheers leon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2006, 08:14 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Kal, they are nice images for your first attempt, I like your Saturn Nebula.
The f/3.3 can be a bit tricky to start with but it doen't take long to get the hang of it and then it will prove to be a great tool.

looking forward to more images
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement