Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-11-2016, 07:29 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
NGC 289 work in progress

Hi all,

Struggling a bit with the processing on this one. Not much colour coming out of the galaxy and lots of noise. Probably just need more exposures but have non-trivial quantity already.

http://astrob.in/273586/0/

I am happy with how much of the further extends of the galaxy I've retained after putting some RGB on it.

First tried LRGB combine in PI but that killed a lot of fainter detail, obviously yet to work out the ay PI does LRGB. Then applied Luminance to RGB in PS and that worked much better, at least not killing the detail.

Register, integration and DBE in PI. The rest in PS. Star shrink, noise, sharpening, etc.

Regards,
Roger.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC-289-(RGB-with-Luminance-applied-as-PS-layer).jpg)
196.3 KB41 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-11-2016, 11:32 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
While it has a bright core region, this is a pretty faint galaxy Roger so it is a challenge to process, I love the faint straggly spiral arms on this one, I did a shot of it a couple of year ago and it needed quite a bit of exposure even with 12" and at F3.8 in order to render the arms properly.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2016, 10:00 AM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
While it has a bright core region, this is a pretty faint galaxy Roger so it is a challenge to process, I love the faint straggly spiral arms on this one, I did a shot of it a couple of year ago and it needed quite a bit of exposure even with 12" and at F3.8 in order to render the arms properly.

Mike
Thanks Mike. One day .... more data
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2016, 02:39 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
There is much to like about that image Roger.

It strikes me as a bit like a cross between 6744 and 1566.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement