Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-11-2006, 08:31 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,762
Article: Calculating the Resolution of Solar System Images

Hi All

Al Sheehan (sheeny) has kindly written a how-to article titled Calculating the Resolution of Solar System Images.

You can read the article on the IceInSpace Projects & Articles page, or directly by clicking on the link below:

Calculating the Resolution of Solar System Images

Many thanks to Al for writing the article!

If you'd like to submit an article or a review for IceInSpace, it would be much appreciated! Please contact me.

Last edited by iceman; 16-11-2006 at 06:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-11-2006, 06:37 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,762
Article uploaded.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-11-2006, 06:28 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,326
Red face How Embarrassing!

Guys,

There is an arithmetic mistake in the original article! The method is fine, it's just the numbers from my calculations are not!

I have sent Mike a corrected article, so hopefully it will be put to rest soon.

Of course, someone from CN found it, and broadcast it, much to my embarrassment, but I congratulate them for being on the ball! (Good on you Mardi!) Mike sent me a copy of the post asking my opinion... gee, I hate that feeling when you know you stuffed up!

The mistake was that I actually used 2.32m as the focal length of the C8 and not 2.032m. Marvellous what a difference a zero makes! If I had worked in mm as I usually do the answer would have been out by an order of magnitude and I would've picked it. As it was, I had previously calculated 1059m for the pixel size on the moon at 10x foe the C8, but when writing this article I kept getting 928m or whatever it was. I thought it was wrong, checked it several times and repeatedly got the same answer so figured I must have used the apogee distance to the moon, and not the average distance, previously.

...a shining example of why you should never proof read your own work or check your own calculations! Glad no one was killed!!!

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-11-2006, 06:53 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,762
Article corrected
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-11-2006, 08:33 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,326
Thanks Mike! You're a gem!

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-11-2006, 09:59 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,717
Hi Al

Don't sweat the simple mistake - it's a bit like walking into the Taj Mahal and finding a speck of dust on the floor. It would be foolish of anyone to let the tiny speck detract from the beauty and majesty of the building. Thanks for writing the article - it's hard to write but easy for others to find our small lapses of concentration! You’ve done a terrific job.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-11-2006, 04:46 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
lol al!
nice article

mike is worth his weight in buttercups hey
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-11-2006, 10:48 AM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Excellent article AL this adds a interesting angle to either observing or imaging, I look forward to using the knowledge gained thanks for taking the time to contribute
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-11-2006, 11:10 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by ving
lol al!
nice article

mike is worth his weight in buttercups hey
That's not many cows... oh, you mean buttercup the flower! Absolutely!


Al.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Testar
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement