Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-08-2016, 09:13 AM
bkm2304's Avatar
bkm2304 (Richard Brown)
Heads Up!

bkm2304 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glen William, NSW
Posts: 625
Registax Saved Image Size

Hi all,

When I save the stacked image in Registax 6, the resulting file is very lo res. Does anyone know if there is a way to improve the quality? Currently when I save a BITMAP or a JPG it is about 70k and of course useless.


Richard.

Last edited by bkm2304; 22-08-2016 at 09:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-2016, 08:51 PM
StuTodd
Registered User

StuTodd is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 353
Isn't it dependent on the sensor size etc?
My DMK produces 680x480 size stacks but there is an option to "resize" in the same titled processing box.
Saving as TIFF or PNG allows for a larger file size too...

Stu
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-08-2016, 11:33 PM
bkm2304's Avatar
bkm2304 (Richard Brown)
Heads Up!

bkm2304 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glen William, NSW
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuTodd View Post
Isn't it dependent on the sensor size etc?
My DMK produces 680x480 size stacks but there is an option to "resize" in the same titled processing box.
Saving as TIFF or PNG allows for a larger file size too...

Stu
Hi Stu,
After stacking a gigabytes worth of frames and saving the processed image I am left with a 30 - 70 k image that can't be enlarged without enormous pixelation. Although the chip size is usually small, after stacking this becomes irrelevant. I can save the image as a TIFF of about 1 meg size but this is also a bit disappointing with regard to how much I can enlarge the picture. Surely there must be a way I can save a higher quality image that enlarges well like the processed image in Registax before I save it?

Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-08-2016, 10:10 PM
StuTodd
Registered User

StuTodd is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 353
I'm not altogether "up" on Registax but I had a go on a Ha .avi of the Sun. I stacked 2000 or so frames and ended up with a 534k picture. However, I went to the Resize box and ramped up the size, with Lanczos filter applied.
This gave me a good 5mb .tiff image at the end.

Out of interest, have you tried AutoStakkert as an alternative to Registax? I generally do the align etc in that then save the file and use Registax for the wavelet treatment.

Stu
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2016, 11:31 AM
sil's Avatar
sil (Steve)
Not even a speck of dust

sil is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,474
you can but not from the "final " screen you end up on. once stacked in registax but before the screen with the wavelets there is a save button where you can save high bitdepth (NOT resolution, stacking only gives you depth, not pixels) tif and fits i think and once you move to the screen with wavelets you cant go back i think.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-08-2016, 07:48 PM
bkm2304's Avatar
bkm2304 (Richard Brown)
Heads Up!

bkm2304 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glen William, NSW
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by sil View Post
you can but not from the "final " screen you end up on. once stacked in registax but before the screen with the wavelets there is a save button where you can save high bitdepth (NOT resolution, stacking only gives you depth, not pixels) tif and fits i think and once you move to the screen with wavelets you cant go back i think.
Thanks, Sil. I'll give it a go!

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuTodd View Post
I'm not altogether "up" on Registax but I had a go on a Ha .avi of the Sun. I stacked 2000 or so frames and ended up with a 534k picture. However, I went to the Resize box and ramped up the size, with Lanczos filter applied.
This gave me a good 5mb .tiff image at the end.

Out of interest, have you tried AutoStakkert as an alternative to Registax? I generally do the align etc in that then save the file and use Registax for the wavelet treatment.

Stu
Thanks, Stu, I have tried Autostakkert but I don't seem to be getting a better resolution. But I will try your suggestion with the Lanczos filter.

Richard
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement