This doesn't even belong here. whoever you are trying to convince us this bogus you should be on "Conspiracies 101 forum" or something. Icein SPACE for gods sakes. Read this. http://www.24media.info/2016/06/scie...istant-humans/
Nice try fella. Ha!, next you'll be telling me we can't trust our corporate and political institutions, Santa isn't real and chicken nuggets ain't chicken.
I bet you don't even want me to vote Trump for PM in July either!.
Why does the 'truth' have to be whatever is contrary to mainstream perceived belief?
A homeless guy who lives under the bridge told me that money is used as a virus vector for mind control experiments. Is that a truth worth investigating?
There will always be people who challenge the norm, but not all challengers are worth listening to. You have question the quality of the source.
So Hubble doesn't exist? Is that your claim based on this video?
I do wish you would actually state what you are trying to say when you post this stuff instead all this "truth" nonsense.
There are out there... last week, my daughter's year 12 chemistry teacher, after viewing a documentary with the class about the moon landing and assorted conspiracy theories during an extra curricular activity, said that the argument in favour of an hoax looked "pretty convincing". Just wondering if I'm going to stay civil at the next parent-teacher meeting or have a dig at him and ask him to enlighten me.
We're totally not judging you by the conspiracy theories you share. You're intelligent and obviously important enough to be privy to highly-classified, top-secret knowledge.
There are out there... last week, my daughter's year 12 chemistry teacher said that the argument in favour of a hoax looked "pretty convincing".
I'd go in with fake fire and brimstone myself.
I'd be pretty sure that the gist would have been along the lines of, "While they have a pretty convincing argument, nothing they say explains why there are lunar module pieces still on the moon, let alone the laser reflectors."
I doubt that the teacher is a convert, but I would try to sweat them out, for a larf!
Some classical psychological experiments of the 60s- 70's-80's looked at how people's beliefs , even when faced with contrary factual evidence, can actually become more entrenched. It becomes more likely also that when faced with the 'disconfirmation,' they are more likely to rally around for new 'followers' who can be converted to the same World view and can share the same opinion/'illusion, thus confirming it. And further entrenching it.
See 'The day the World didn't end " based on research by Prof's. Festinger/Reicken/Schacter, also article -
Dawson, L.L, 1999, " When Prophecy fails and faith persists: A Theoretical Overview. " Nova Religio 3: 60-82.
Bottom line is, for the flat Earther's and Lunar conspiracy theorists- your wasting your breath trying to change their minds.
Disconfirmation and subsequent hardening of beliefs is also, as an aside, thought of and associated with spreading of Religious beliefs.
Graz, -Lunar Cheese Mechanic
Last edited by graham.hobart; 24-06-2016 at 11:04 AM.
Reason: spelling
