Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-05-2016, 10:04 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
a good read on the pluto debate

Long known as the ninth planet, Pluto was downgraded by the International Astronomy Union in 2006, sparking a vituperative spat between two scientists that has sparked a debate about how we understand the universe

By Andrew Anthony / The Observer

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit...5/2003645521/1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2016, 10:39 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Interesting read, though, to me Pluto will always be the ninth planet in our solar system. Just because of a vote, taken by a bunch of nerds, my view will not change on this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2016, 10:56 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
same here - that clearing the neighbourhood 'requirement' should be scrapped.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2016, 11:16 AM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,364
Given Pluto crosses the orbit of Neptune, you could argue that Neptune has not "Cleared the neighborhood" so should be demoted.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2016, 12:15 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_bluester View Post
Given Pluto crosses the orbit of Neptune, you could argue that Neptune has not "Cleared the neighborhood" so should be demoted.
Their orbits do not ever cross in 3D space...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2016, 12:33 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,107
The whole discussion is totally irrelevant IMO.
However, all those snowy balls are very similar in size and composition... and VERY different from gas giants.
And, the planet migration and "cleaning" the neighbourhood from debris was very important phase in the evolution of the Solar system… so they used it in attempt to draw some lines between the various classes/types of planetary bodies that orbit Sol.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2016, 02:31 PM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
So this hypothetical planet X=9 which is not seen and is nearly out to 1 light year,how can they know if it has cleared it orbit either. ?
It means they are going on the guestimated size and mass and nothing else.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-05-2016, 03:41 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed View Post
same here - that clearing the neighbourhood 'requirement' should be scrapped.

Based on that waffle of an idea, there are no planets. Besides, it would be nice to boast that we have a solar system containing a hundred planets. Anyone taking a casual look at Cere's, let alone the Pluto/Charon system can hardly call them random rocks... Brown's berks have, like, slipped dudes..

Last edited by el_draco; 05-05-2016 at 03:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2016, 04:46 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
What about bodies that do not have an orbit?

e.g. CFBDSIR 2149-0403
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2016, 05:26 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT View Post
What about bodies that do not have an orbit?

e.g. CFBDSIR 2149-0403
According to the definition, it aint a planet.. Gets dumber by the moment, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-05-2016, 08:11 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
I didn't lose any sleep over the Pluto demotion, prefer that scenario to have some 13 planets to remember! Ceres is a large rock / dwarf planet and should remain so
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement