Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-05-2016, 10:43 PM
thegableguy's Avatar
thegableguy (Chris)
Registered User

thegableguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 337
Omega Centauri, second attempt

My first attempt at this target two weeks ago was pretty ordinary - I was still learning to drift align and my processing & editing wasn't great. This one is significantly better, but keen to hear any suggestions of how it can be improved. 22 x 60-second subs (unguided) at ISO 1600.

[Sorry for the constant stream of new threads here - I'm just excited I've learnt to drift align and have clear moonless skies, making the most of it]
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Omega Centauri 160503.jpg)
224.3 KB77 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2016, 11:18 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Looking good; my only comment is that the core is a bit blown out. You
needed some much shorter subs so that you could use layers to correct that.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2016, 01:02 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Don't be sorry at all Chris, it is always exciting to start having images come out Always better to have a new thread for each target otherwise it becomes complicated within the thread.

On a target like this I would probably suggest dropping the ISO to 800 (others may disagree) so to increase the dynamic range. The core of the cluster is a lot brighter than the dimmer areas due to star density.

It is looking good though
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2016, 01:37 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
Not bad at all Chris, yes a little over cooked in the middle, but a great effort indeed.
As suggested, drop your ISO even further, when i was imaging i never went over 400 ISO, and it did make a difference, however that is just a suggestion.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2016, 02:16 PM
thegableguy's Avatar
thegableguy (Chris)
Registered User

thegableguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Not bad at all Chris, yes a little over cooked in the middle, but a great effort indeed.
As suggested, drop your ISO even further, when i was imaging i never went over 400 ISO, and it did make a difference, however that is just a suggestion.

Leon
I assume you were guided..? I'm at the mercy of my own alignment. I could probably get away with 400 for targets this bright, but nebulae need at least 800 for 2 mins (which is about my maximum). My cheap DSLR wouldn't pick up any faint detail at all, the sensor simply isn't sophisticated enough.

Quick question, though - if I shoot at several different ISOs for the one target, do I just chuck them all in together in DSS or do I need to make two separate TIFs and then combine them in Photoshop?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-05-2016, 02:48 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
nice one chris, I have always struggled with globs.
this is really good.
if you go for a couple of iso's stack separately in DSS and combine later on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-05-2016, 04:39 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Your all assuming he knows how to layer, cut and combine. Chris do you understand that processing jargon? And how to do it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2016, 05:39 PM
thegableguy's Avatar
thegableguy (Chris)
Registered User

thegableguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Your all assuming he knows how to layer, cut and combine. Chris do you understand that processing jargon? And how to do it?
If you're talking about stuff done in Photoshop, then yes - that was my best guess as to what to try next.

If you're talking about something done in DSS, however, then not a clue!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement