Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-12-2015, 11:39 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
Trapezium – Mewlon 180 vs Hubble Space telescope

Hi Folks

Whilst preparing to record the 5 brighter satellites of Uranus, I thought I’d see what the ASI174MM and TeleVue x2 Powermate (2”) could pull out of the Trapezium cluster.

I captured a few AVI’s and selected the best to create a composite showing the main stars of this famous cluster. The final image is a blend of 200 frames (at 300ms) and 50 frames (at 5 secs). The effective focal length was 4320mm at F24.

I have also included a reference image (and animation) from the Hubble Space Telescope for comparison.

Information provided by SkyTools:
The Trapezium Multiple Star System
Magnitude: 6.72

AB: 6.72+7.49 mag, PA 31° Sep 8.80" (2002)
AC: 6.72+5.06 mag, PA 132° Sep 12.70" (2002)
AD: 6.72+6.38 mag, PA 96° Sep 21.20" (2002)
AE: 6.72+11.1 mag, PA 349° Sep 4.90" (2002)
CF: 5.06+11.5 mag, PA 123° Sep 4.00" (1990)
CG: 5.06+16.7 mag, PA 32° Sep 8.60" (1983)
AH: 6.72+15.8 mag, PA 178° Sep 7.90" (1889)

Cambridge Double Star Atlas showpieces (v2) Group: aka theta-1 ORI

This stunning multiple star lies right at the centre of the Orion Nebula M42. It's the middle star of the Sword of the Hunter. Its name, the Trapezium, is not stolen. Four gems twinkle in an attractive tiny area, recent products in the gas and dust cloud. Lots of faint stars in the surrounding area also are physically involved, all of them are highly young and unstable lights, less than 100 000 years old. The Trapezium was first sketched in 1656, and first photographed in 1880. Also try to spot the other doubles in this region, like Theta 2, Iota and Struve 747


Cheers

Dennis
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trapezium Stars_224322 Mewlon 180 600.jpg)
130.8 KB111 views
Click for full-size image (Trapezium Stars_224322 HST 600.jpg)
136.6 KB93 views
Click for full-size image (Trapezium Stars_223158 6 Main Stars1024.jpg)
152.8 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (Trapezium Stars_224322 Original Crop 1024.jpg)
106.0 KB77 views
Click for full-size image (Trapezium-Stars_224322-Mewlon-180-vs-HST-600.gif)
165.9 KB119 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2015, 11:52 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nicely done, Dennis, and at a fraction of the cost of a space telescope
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2015, 11:52 AM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
Fantastic Dennis .... animation certainly shows the difference.

I've only ever seen 5 in the Trapezium using averted vision.

4 of them are quite easily seen ... the other 2 not so easily...depending on seeing conditions.

Col...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2015, 06:53 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
That's pretty cool Dennis. I want to try lots of short exposures next time as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2015, 07:25 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
That's pretty cool Dennis. I want to try lots of short exposures next time as well.
Lucky imaging
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2015, 11:08 AM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Wickedly sharp. Nicely processed to bring out the stars.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2015, 08:23 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
Thanks Rick, Col, Marc, Colin & Mike and Trish, I appreciate your comments.

The ASI174MM has 5.86 um pixels, so I’ll try the ASI120MM with its 3.75um pixels next time the seeing is good, as that should increase the on-screen separation by placing more pixels between the components of the Trapezium stars.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement