Thanks Rick and Rex. Yes, I'm itching to get out again and get more data to add to this project.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
I like the detail in this Chris.
|
Thanks David. I'm quite happy with the results so far. The observatory is making a real difference to the data I'm getting. I should go attempt some analysis of the exposures with and without the observatory to be sure, but just eyeballing it, the observatory based images just seem to be a bit higher quality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
I ended up buying Maxim DL as a way to deal with blooming and also dithering as they have a good software solution over CCDSoft. A bit of overkill but overtime I have been leveraging the many other features in that software from acquisition through to telescope control and plate solving.
|
My signature shows the software I'm using. While I'm doing this project using software on Windows, eventually I'll be switching over to a Linux based system to do everything (it's not that far off). The PixInsight I use is on Linux.
So I try to avoid using software that I can't run on both systems (unless it's really cheap like APT or BYEOS). Even when I get the Linux system fully operational, I'll be keeping the Windows version going as well (I find it handles the DSLR better than under Linux at this time).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJT
PI haven't really focussed on a solution for blooming prefaring using techniques such as CCD rotation rather than destroying data which is fair enough. But if you are short of clear skies...
|
I am of a similar mindset to the PI team in that I'm going to try very hard not to destroy data as much as possible/feasible. So, to that end, I'll probably leave the blooming in there if I don't get enough data.
While clear skies seem rare, at least there's a lot of time left for this year, and I suppose there's always next year as well.