Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-05-2015, 12:01 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
The Electric Car

I find formula E encouraging
But batteries need to be better
Will electric cars replace petrol
Limited range seems insurmountable
Any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-05-2015, 12:41 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
these look pretty good overall with 500km range - wouldn't mind being able to afford one.

http://www.teslamotors.com/en_AU/models

Last edited by Shiraz; 17-05-2015 at 01:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-05-2015, 12:44 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Range is improving all the time, but I think that in the medium
term, fuel cell cars hold more promise. There are now prototypes
on test.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-05-2015, 01:11 PM
OzStarGazer's Avatar
OzStarGazer
Nerd from Outer Space

OzStarGazer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Next to my scope
Posts: 1,091
Today I went to the beach and on my way home a car puffed BLACK smoke into my face. I wish it had been an electric car...
I don't even know if it is legal to have a car with such old exhaust pipes? I don't think it is...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-05-2015, 02:18 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
these look pretty good overall with 500km range - wouldn't mind being able to afford one.

http://www.teslamotors.com/en_AU/models
I like it.
Not bad range.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-05-2015, 03:35 PM
simmo's Avatar
simmo
Registered User

simmo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 288
check out lightning motorcycles. Would love one.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-05-2015, 03:40 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I like it.
Not bad range.
just did a bit more reading - if I got it right, the Tesla is basically a mobile computer with seats and the operating system is regularly upgraded over the internet in the background (much like a Win8 PC). Crikey, that has some implications - "sorry I'm late, but my car was downloading an update and wouldn't go" or "I wasn't speeding your honor, someone hacked my car and they made it go faster".

Last edited by Shiraz; 17-05-2015 at 03:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-05-2015, 04:20 PM
Chif (Andrew)
Registered User

Chif is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I find formula E encouraging
But batteries need to be better
Will electric cars replace petrol
Limited range seems insurmountable
Any ideas?
Yes batteries need to be better, and preferably also produced using renewable energy. Not only that, but the ability to charge them quicker needs to happen also.

When we are at that stage (not too far away), electric cars will definitely replace petrol. They are faster, less components to break down and of course better for the environment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzStarGazer View Post
Today I went to the beach and on my way home a car puffed BLACK smoke into my face. I wish it had been an electric car...
I don't even know if it is legal to have a car with such old exhaust pipes? I don't think it is...
It was probably a diesel. It's not to do with the actual exhaust pipes, it's the engine itself (whether it's leaking oil or air fuel ratio was off).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-05-2015, 05:01 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I have a design for a golf cart covered in solar panels.
Just for around the property.
The panels are for charging not drive.
Just for short trips that once were walkable
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-05-2015, 07:42 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Great idea, but unfortunately electric cars generate 30 to 200% more greenhouse gas than internal combustion engines when used in Australia (guess where the electricity comes from), hydrogen cell powered is the worst by far, insanely inefficient.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-05-2015, 07:51 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
these look pretty good overall with 500km range - wouldn't mind being able to afford one.

http://www.teslamotors.com/en_AU/models
I would 100% buy one if I could afford it, in the US they have "supercharger" stations all over the country where you can fully charge it for free in about an hour. That fact alone gets around the range issues, and they have just started rolling them out here. I even read in the states some people were getting a bit cheeky and reversing the charging station in their house so that the energy they got for free from the supercharger powered their house.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Great idea, but unfortunately electric cars generate 30 to 200% more greenhouse gas than internal combustion engines when used in Australia (guess where the electricity comes from), hydrogen cell powered is the worst by far, insanely inefficient.

It is a good point to bring up the issue of power generation in Australia, but to say that an electric car generates more greenhouse than an ICE is a bit of a stretch. If anything it highlights the need for an alternate energy source. I would like to see nuclear developed, specifically in South Australia because I am of the opinion that providing cheaper power is one hurdle to innovation such as this.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-05-2015, 08:14 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Great idea, but unfortunately electric cars generate 30 to 200% more greenhouse gas than internal combustion engines when used in Australia (guess where the electricity comes from), hydrogen cell powered is the worst by far, insanely inefficient.
different in SA Fred - we currently get over 30% power from renewables and are on the way to 50%. On some days, we have generated more power via wind than we could use - and solar can be as high as 20-25% at the daily peak. I guess that means that electric cars would be roughly equivalent to IC in carbon output, in this state.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-05-2015, 08:18 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M View Post
It is a good point to bring up the issue of power generation in Australia, but to say that an electric car generates more greenhouse than an ICE is a bit of a stretch..
Its not a stretch, its a fact, electric cars in Australia right now are a potential enviromental disaster. Although on board energy conversion to traction power is efficient, the generation, delivery and storage of this power is wildly inefficient and expensive (let alone the enviromental impacts of actually building them and the infrustracture to support them, which is very energy intensive). Until these factors are resolved, electric cars are vastly more enviromentaly damaging than internal combustion. I agree, alternative energy scources are the key, but let us not kid ourselves, right now, electic cars are NOT the answer to anything.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-05-2015, 08:52 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I think there would be less noise and petrol exhaust fumes if we had only electric cars.
Burning oil, coal or gas to provide them with electricity does not make since but making them solar dependent would be doable.
Storing solar power or wind power is the key..we need better batteries or should I call them accumulators.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-05-2015, 09:10 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I think there would be less noise and petrol exhaust fumes if we had only electric cars.
.
what!, do you consider the exhaust fumes and noise of IC bother for you to be more of a problem than the enviromental damage that electric cars cause to be a more important issue?. Thats a bit selfish.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-05-2015, 09:39 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I only said there would be less fumes and noise and made no comment on the desirability.
Did you notice I suggested a dependence on solar energy.
On the basis that electric cars be powered by solar do you suggest there is higher environmental damage. Solar to charge the batteries.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-05-2015, 09:43 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Fred, it's refreshing to see someone who has an understanding of the limitations of electric vehicles.

The real issue is the enormous amount of power required to push a car around and the lack of sustainable capacity to feed the worldwide demand in to the future.

Combustion engines generate enormous amounts of power, an engine averaging just 25Kw over a couple of hours and would need almost 3 times the daily household national average to run for those couple of hours electrically.

Extrapolate that to the numbers of cars worldwide and you'll understand why electric cars aren't the future.

IMO future transport needs to be more efficient, public transport, foot and bicycles.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-05-2015, 10:02 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
I only said there would be less fumes and noise and made no comment on the desirability.
Did you notice I suggested a dependence on solar energy.
On the basis that electric cars be powered by solar do you suggest there is higher environmental damage. Solar to charge the batteries.
Well yes actually. Solar panels are made of Silicon, steel, aluminium and glass. All those materials require high temperature foundries that use vast amounts of power to produce. Ive seen research that shows (depending on the scource of power, mostly coal if from China) that the carbon footprint of manufacturing solar panels can have an enviromental payback time in the order of 15 years, about the same as the usefull lifetime of a solar panel. This is improving all the time with panel efficiency BTW, but as it stands, the enviromental impact of solar panel manufacture/lifetime output use has no enviromental damage advantage over fossil fuel. Are you suprised?.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-05-2015, 10:07 PM
torana68's Avatar
torana68 (Roger)
Registered User

torana68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ACT/NSW
Posts: 786
Convert your car to methanol (NOT ethanol) it's renewable, you could make it at home �� even lpg is better than the current electrics , consider where the electricity comes from now and the really environmently bad stuff in the batteries that are in use.

Last edited by torana68; 17-05-2015 at 10:13 PM. Reason: London is killing my brain cells
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-05-2015, 10:19 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Yes and no.
There are no free lunches.
Phil is right about energy demand and how difficult it would be to have electric cars world wide.
I wonder what the current draw is on a formula W car..
You need 4 panels for 1000 watts which is small horses.
Your battery bank would be huge...I can work it out if I know what power an electric car would use...but indeed you would need many panels and large battery capacity just for one car.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement