Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-05-2015, 05:11 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,160
OTA Counterweights needed?

http://www.astro-physics.com/index.h...ducts/products

I am wondering why there is a counter weight on the top of this AP RHA.

Does it improve balance somehow? Any thoughts?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2015, 05:16 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Greg

I reckon its there to replace a guide scope that isnt currently fitted at present.
Ie i reckon they balanced the unit for a main scope and guide scope, then removed the guide scope and used the upper weights to rebalance.
That way they can mixn match without ever having to move the main counterweights.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2015, 08:26 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,160
Thanks Andrew.

That may be the case. I was wondering if its best practice to put a counter weight up top to help centre the gravity of the scope as many scopes are top heavy.

Like where you balance the scope horizontally but its out of balance at the angle you image at.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2015, 09:34 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Greg
Quote:
I was wondering if its best practice to put a counter weight up top to help centre the gravity of the scope as many scopes are top heavy.
Nope.
The static balance point of the system is relative to the RA and DEC axles of the mount, not the fitted scope .
If you add a weight where they did, you will always need to compensate on the other side of the RA axle, ie the std counterweights.
I can see no logical reason to stick a weight where they did unless it was to simulate something else that may be fitted there.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2015, 09:37 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,160
Thanks for that Andrew. I oftened wondered about that.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement