Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-03-2005, 10:20 AM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Last Nights Effort

Here we go again people. I still cant seem to get the focus right. I read somewhere that the IR filter in the toucam can cause focusing hassles on refractors, even highly corrected ones like the Tak. This might be the problem, as I was sure I had it spot on.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup23 march no1.jpg)
12.4 KB67 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-03-2005, 11:14 AM
vindictive666's Avatar
vindictive666 (John)
KeyboardNotFndPressAnyKey

vindictive666 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: geraldton western australia
Posts: 1,184
still a good picture though
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-03-2005, 12:17 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Not sure what the situation is with I/R filters, I have NEVER used one, and that included Mars. Whereas others swear by them. Be nice to have a definitive answer though.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-03-2005, 12:35 PM
westsky
Registered User

westsky is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 335
Hi, Nice image lots of detail present.
The recommendation from meade with the DSI and refractors is to remove the Ir filter, same goes for the LPI, The IR filter is there to help acro's focus the colours , you use a Tak so most if not all colour is already focused, try it again without the Ir filter and I think you will find getting focus will be easier. Then we will see some great shots from the Tak I am sure :-))

cheers
david
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-03-2005, 12:43 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Great shot, apart from the soft focus. Was that at prime focus or with a barlow? What's the FL of your tak?

If the seeing allows, try for a bigger barlow for an increased image scale. Can't wait to see your next shots!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-03-2005, 12:44 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Exfso are you hartmann masking for focus on a star near Jupiter first (eg spica)? Apart from the focus lovely shot. I like the colour (maybe a bit less brightness/whiteness, can you adjust the white balance?) and I can definately see that there is detail hiding in under the off focus.

Top Stuff. Welcome to the addiction
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-03-2005, 07:30 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Nice Peter, already leaps ahead where I was one month into it. Yeah try removing the IR filter from the Toucam and see how that goes. It might help with your focus.

Doing well, keep at it. You got the equipment, your going to do it. Us Taureans can't help ourselves.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-03-2005, 07:49 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
According to Matthew who sells the Toucam, the IR filter is an integral part of the original toucam lens, it is not the piece of glass covering the CCD. So it is, according to him without the IR filter when doing prime focus stuff. I am getting more confused.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-03-2005, 07:59 PM
Comet Hunter's Avatar
Comet Hunter
Registered User

Comet Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SE QLD
Posts: 381
So you're using the Toucam with the adapter only?? = no IR filter...??
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-03-2005, 11:22 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, that is correct. No IR filter..

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-03-2005, 05:59 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Oh I thought you were using one. Anyway that's not the problem with the focus.
Was seeing really bad when you took this?

A bit of unsharp mask might make it look a bit sharper too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-03-2005, 09:17 AM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
yeah seeing was probably 5/10 at best and wind was about 5-10kts. not ideal thats for sure.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-03-2005, 09:32 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That might be some of the problem with the soft look then.. How many frames did you stack?

Have you got the original avi that I have a poke at?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement