Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-03-2015, 03:42 AM
MGTechDVP's Avatar
MGTechDVP (Mariusz)
Space Monkey

MGTechDVP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 272
Imaging Source deep sky experiment

Hi All,

I was wondering about long exposure and deep sky imaging using the Imaging source DMK41. I was googling for info online, not much was out there about it, and the small amount all stated that the noise due to heating up of the sensor makes it too noisy for anything over 30seconds... also the ADC was only 8 bit so that would limit the stretchability of the final image.

So I'm thinking if it's only heat and bit depth of the image that the obstacle, (since the software allows upto an hour of exposure) then surely there is a way to cool the CCD and stacking of multiple subs will increase the bit depth.

So I attached two 12V peltiers, heatsinks and fans to the DMK41, ran a few tests and surely the noise did lessen, all but near dissapeared even in a 30 minute test dark frame... all it took in photoshop was a noise reduction of 1 pixel with threshold of 5 to remove nothing but the overactive pixels.

Results are as follows. The focal length used was F10 on my 8" SCT. for guiding I was using an off axis guider, and had to use the DMK21 and PHD for guiding since, there were only 2 stars within the reach of the prism, and neither was bright enough for the nexguide to pickup.

I also found that the focus change very slightly as the CCD reached it's lowest temperature, atleast I hope that that's why the final image is a bit soft, but on both nights the focus was slightly off after the cooler ran for about 10-15 minutes, only a slight adjustment was needed to to refocus the stars to points.

Attached images are:
image 1. The cooling setup
image 2. Uncooled 15 min dark sub
image 3. Cooled 15 min dark sub
image 4. Uncooled 30 min dark sub
image 5. Cooled 30 min dark sub
image 6. raw 10 minute with 520 gain exposure of the M104 galaxy
image 7. M104 with 6 10 min subs and 4 15 min subs stacked and stretched and 5 minutes of unguided R, G & B 1 min subs 1023 gain for color.

Notice how there is no more noise on the 30 minute cooled dark frame test compared to the 15 minute test.

Next time I'll let the DMK cool for 15 minutes before imaging, refocus, grab 10, 20 & 30 min subs as well as more color data.


I think the results are promising, what do you think?

Mariusz
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_6491.jpg)
191.6 KB34 views
Click for full-size image (15min_uncooled0001 15-03-18 03-33-08.jpg)
138.2 KB27 views
Click for full-size image (15min_cooled0002 15-03-18 05-13-17.jpg)
9.7 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (30min_uncooled0001 15-03-18 04-37-37.jpg)
183.3 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (30min_cooled0002 15-03-18 06-17-05.jpg)
12.2 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (10min520g_cooled0002 15-03-19 01-05-27.jpg)
32.3 KB36 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_6523.JPG)
78.9 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-03-2015, 03:24 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Hi Mariusz,

Certainly very interesting investigation and commendable results

However, I would question usefulness of long subs with an 8-bit camera - bright parts of galaxies or nebulae will saturate fairly quickly - you can see that clearly in your nevertheless quite impressive image (check the galaxy's core).

Therefore, although it might be usable on some objects and will surely provide valuable experience, 8-bits will most likely be insufficient in capturing faint nebulosities and structures without saturating brighter parts of DSOs.

Having said that, I look forward to seeing more of your space images!

Slawomir
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-03-2015, 08:00 PM
MGTechDVP's Avatar
MGTechDVP (Mariusz)
Space Monkey

MGTechDVP is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 272
Thanks for the feed back, Slawomir...

I think that the 8 bit limit will be more with stretching the exposures and more prone to banding rather then blowing out the core or brighter DSO parts. In every M104 image I have seen the core is always blown out, but also in images like M42 where the core blows out quickly with even my 14 bit DSLR, the work around is to expose subs for the core, the mid brightness and the longest subs for the dimmest parts of the object and then selectively combine in photoshop by masking or erasing the undesired part in each sub stack, like HDR.

The 8 bit limit surely will be overcome by stacking multiple 8 bit images using a additive algorithm in a 16 bit color space then re adjust the black level... I don't know, maybe I'm nuts expecting too much from the DMK41, but I'll experiment with it and see what develops over the next few outings.

If I can get away with maintaining focus and expose for 20-30 min subs, and can get some detail in the edge of the galaxy as well as detail in the dust lane, I'll be over the moon.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-03-2015, 09:32 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Your plan for imaging sounds reasonable, I am really looking forward to seeing what can you do with your DMK41!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement