Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-09-2014, 08:36 PM
FlashDrive's Avatar
FlashDrive (Poppy)
Senior Citizen

FlashDrive is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
Want ' BIG ' Storage

WD has some ' BIG ' Hard Drives on the way......

http://news.filehippo.com/2014/09/18935/

I wonder if ' Windows 7 / Windows 8 will ' recognize such large storage devices....... ( most likely ... or Microsoft will offer a ' patch ' )

Partitioning such drives might get around that issue

Imagine how long it would take to ' format ' one of these.

Come in handy for NAS or Media Servers.....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-09-2014, 09:32 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashDrive View Post
WD has some ' BIG ' Hard Drives on the way......

http://news.filehippo.com/2014/09/18935/

I wonder if ' Windows 7 / Windows 8 will ' recognize such large storage devices....... ( most likely ... or Microsoft will offer a ' patch ' )

Partitioning such drives might get around that issue

Imagine how long it would take to ' format ' one of these.

Come in handy for NAS or Media Servers.....
According to M$ for disks bigger than 2TB, the O/S has to support GPT format partition tables. The system has to have a UEFI boot ROM if you want to boot from the disk.

GPT works in Vista, Win7 and above, Server 2008 and above and supports disks up to 9.4ZB. That's 9.4e15 bytes. ZB=zetabytes.

I wonder if Synology would support them in its NAS boxes? 6x10TB would give me something between 45 and 50TB. Mine's currently got 2TB disks formatted as 1 RAID5 volume.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-09-2014, 10:09 PM
algwat (Alan)
Registered User

algwat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Melbourne, west
Posts: 286
Always wanted a 10TB system, but a few more cores would be better.
Keep an eye on these guys, 16/64 cores and more, just via usb.

http://www.adapteva.com/

kind regards, alan.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-10-2014, 08:11 PM
Cameron (Cameron Roberts)
CameronRobertson

Cameron is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Dee Why
Posts: 4
I honestly don't think there's going to be very much of an issue. If hard drives improve their storage capability, software will just have to catch up, and they have been so far haven't they? I really don't think it was that long ago when we jumped from the MB to the GB and then to the TB. Technology will find a way!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-10-2014, 09:12 PM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,365
i am just itching for SSD to catch up to what I reckon is the current NAS sweet spot of about 4TB per drive. I have an 8 bay NAS with 4 X 4TB drives in a single RAID5 array for general storage, and I don't expect to fill it any time particularly soon, there is a single 3TB used as a disaster drive so in the case of another bushfire or similar issue we can just hot unplug the 3TB and make off with our critical data under our arm. Yet to work out a good offsite plan as well though.

When I got this NAS a few months ago (Which replaced a 4 bay job) the 6TB-He drives were just popping up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement