Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-03-2005, 02:31 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
LMC Widish Field

Time to get back into the swing of some DSO imaging, after more than a few headaches and failures.
The LMC is a composite of 3 shots, each about 2 minutes, at ISO125, with the dreaded Nikon D100, and old/ugly Nikkor 300mm at f4.5.
Definitely an object to work on.
Gary
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (lmc-web.jpg)
106.5 KB113 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-03-2005, 02:39 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Nice shot Gary, excellent nebula capture. Did you stack in Reg3 or use photoshop? Unguided?

So that's where all my cloud had come from. Left the Land of the Long White Cloud and headed to Queensland. I hope it stays away for you a bit longer so you can post a few more of these.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-03-2005, 02:45 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's just beautiful Gary, another one for print!

Look at NGC2070 and all those nice little star clusters in there!

I love it! Thanks for posting!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-03-2005, 04:39 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Ice/Paul,
thanks, I have had a few (no, more than a few) glitches with guiding/imaging lately, and almost ready to throw in the towel, being the wimp I am.
This one was an effort to revert back to basics. Being a 300mm it didn't need quite the guiding, but it was, on the G-11, and using the ToUcam and Robby's StarMate.
I had intended shooting about 8 - 10 images for stacking, but the cloud only allowed 3, and then covered the sky. Such is life.
The slave stacked them in Photshop. I may rework it, and try a dark or two, something I haven't really persevered with, as I simply use the built in N/R setting.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-03-2005, 05:01 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Lovely shot, might I suggest using a flat field on the shot. Other than that, this is very good, captured the irregularity very well. Congrats and lets see some more.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-03-2005, 01:23 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Absolutely brilliant Gary (the shot, not the light source).

Tarantula really stands out! Well done!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-03-2005, 07:37 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Thats a nice image, a tad too much magnification, for me anyway, but really good detail.

Well done!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-03-2005, 08:42 AM
Comet Hunter's Avatar
Comet Hunter
Registered User

Comet Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SE QLD
Posts: 381
Simply beautiful Gary, great work!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-03-2005, 02:01 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Quote:
Lovely shot, might I suggest using a flat field on the shot.
Is their any chance someone can use 1 image and explain the difference......I hear terms such as Flat field, F10,F20,F30 focal reducers virtualy every term when it comes to astrophotography......

It would be nice if someone could show us in picture form what these differences are.....

For eg...Gary's picture looks great to me but what would a flatter field do and what difference does it make to the picture.....

Maybe have 4 or 5 pictures of the same image using and explaining what I have just spoken about....

In short...all I want to know is what difference this make to your image......I'm sure others are scratching their heads aswell...I hope.....lol
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-03-2005, 02:21 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
nice pic gary.

unfortunately the IT dept here at work swapped my old CRT for a LG flatron LCD... pics dont look as good on the monitor and i dont seem to be able to do anything about it
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-03-2005, 05:18 PM
MiG's Avatar
MiG
Registered User

MiG is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally posted by ving
nice pic gary.

unfortunately the IT dept here at work swapped my old CRT for a LG flatron LCD... pics dont look as good on the monitor and i dont seem to be able to do anything about it
You should be able to improve it using this page:
http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-03-2005, 07:22 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
thanks mig.

viewed from at home it looks much better
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement