Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:00 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
IC2944 and Thackeray Globules Ha

Another project I am sort of working on.

I did this object some years ago with the RC8 and QSI583. I like this field of view better with the STXL 11002 covering a bit more ground and showing some of the surrounding dust clouds.

This is 5 x 30 minutes subs so far.

Low noise already so it might not need a lot of data to control the noise. I am thinking maybe 15 -20 hours of data collection required.

As you can see the star shapes in the corners are not great and I seem to have more tilt at the top of the image over the bottom. I have had some odd guiding behaviour last night with several more subs being lost because guiding would all of a sudden jump, with the result producing egg shaped stars. There was no apparent reason for the error, so I am hoping it is one of those glitches that happen sometimes with automation. If it results again I will need to investigate further. The bad subs were rejected, but one or two subs in this image have some misshape to the stars. In the end I will use data which will not exhibit this problem.

Click here for higher resolution image
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IC2944 Ha 150 cs.jpg)
77.0 KB94 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:24 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Looking promising, Paul. The high res isn't 1:1 is it?

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:44 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Looking promising, Paul. The high res isn't 1:1 is it?

Cheers,
Rick.
No, it is 2200 pixels wide. The native size is 4008 wide.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2014, 06:55 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Thanks, Paul. Would love to see a 1:1 when you're ready to unveil it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2014, 07:23 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,823
The tonal range and contrast are beautiful throughout the frame and the image just looks so “clean” for a better word. Some nicely recorded intense structures and formations threading their way throughout this lovely region.

Nice work Paul, you’re really logging some long hours for these images.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2014, 09:01 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 970
Very impressive Paul, if the weather wasnt to bad lately I would have come down last new moon weekend to see you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2014, 09:28 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Superb! Incredible details in the boks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2014, 04:14 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Very nice detail Paul. I probably wouldn't have noticed the misshapen stars if you hadn't mentioned them.

Cheers

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2014, 02:21 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Thanks guys, just out of interest, this object does not contain Bok globules, these are Thackeray globules instead, there is a subtle difference apparently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M View Post
Very impressive Paul, if the weather wasnt to bad lately I would have come down last new moon weekend to see you.
Yeah weather this year has been a little ordinary. It is interrupting my imaging a bit. Missed Mars at opposition too as a result.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2014, 07:36 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Thanks guys, just out of interest, this object does not contain Bok globules, these are Thackeray globules instead, there is a subtle difference
They're bok globules discovered by david thackeray
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2014, 10:36 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
They're bok globules discovered by david thackeray
According to Wikipedia, these objects are Bok globules but are known as Thackeray Globules. Odd.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IC_2944
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement