Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-07-2006, 12:41 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
HF39 and the Red Spider Nebula

Howdy
After the bad weather surprisingly clearing, got some imaging done.
A little planetary nebula near Eta carina looked like it was worth trying for, especially as Star Atlas Pro reported it to be Mag 9.29 H beta, and sure enough it was surprisingly bright. I did 2x 10 mins ISO 400 with the UHCS filter.

Next object is the Red Spider Nebula NGC 3537 in Saggitarius. Oddly its fainter (mag 13) yet has an NGC designation whereas poor old HF39 does not.
2x 10 mins also, UHCS filtered
Both shots with 10 inch F5.6 scope, hand guided. Both images here are full resolution crops from the centre of much bigger images. Minimal processing done just the standard dark subtraction etc, in Iris and Photoshop. Taken with modded 350D camera
Scott
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (HF39 2x10 mins iso400 uhcs.jpg)
64.4 KB55 views
Click for full-size image (red spider 2x10 mins iso400 uhcs noflat.jpg)
131.0 KB59 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-07-2006, 07:53 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Scott,

always interesting looking at planetaries with their many different characteristics. Was the spider taken at a higher ISO, just appears to be more grain in the image.

I like em both.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-07-2006, 08:53 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
No, both were taken at the same ISO but the Red Spider image was stretched more to bring it out, as it is considerably fainter.
No 2 planetaries are exactly the same, thats why I like imaging them
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-07-2006, 12:05 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
I can see why you nursed your mirror. Fantastic resolution. For manual guiding even more amazing!

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-07-2006, 12:31 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Thanks.
Now that Ive found out how to best focus, the system can be unforgiving as the slightest guide errors show. I have to be careful in selecting guide stars as being an off axis guider they arent sharp points, but elongated. If I can get one where the elongation runs north-south its much easier as I can keep it aligned on a line on the illuminated recticle.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-07-2006, 12:40 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
nicely captured scott. esp the red spider i like it. How do you normally find these objects?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-07-2006, 07:28 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
I like spidy! great work mate
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-07-2006, 08:09 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Thanks all
Pauls excellent Star Atlas pro software is indespensible
http://www.skylab.com.au/
Heres custom made charts I prepared with Star Atlas pro, the rectangle in the middle of each shot is my field of view, others represent bright emission nebulae.
Scott
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (hf39.gif)
16.4 KB9 views
Click for full-size image (Hf39big.gif)
19.7 KB7 views
Click for full-size image (red spider big.gif)
16.3 KB5 views
Click for full-size image (red spider.gif)
18.4 KB5 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-07-2006, 08:26 AM
Itchy's Avatar
Itchy
still trying

Itchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
Thanks.
Now that Ive found out how to best focus, the system can be unforgiving as the slightest guide errors show.
OK Scott, I'll bite. How do you "best focus"?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-07-2006, 08:35 AM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Howdy. My focusser here http://www.users.on.net/~josiah/focuser/IMG_9933.jpg
has 2 large knobs with knurling machined onto them for grip. I have a bit of wire attached over 1 of them them to act as a pointer, I will take a short image, and check star sizes using camera zoom function. I will then turn the focusser knob say, in 1 row of knurling on the knob by watching it move under my wire pointer. I will take another pic. If stars larger I turn knob opposite way twice as far (2 rows of knurling, approx 2 mm) then take another pic. Usually by 3 or 4 tries I have pretty good focus.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-07-2006, 10:10 PM
Itchy's Avatar
Itchy
still trying

Itchy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunter Valley
Posts: 513
Makes sense. Thanks Scott
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement