ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 10.9%
|
|

08-03-2005, 03:04 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Gotta laugh at that one.
'Used'
Makes ME wanna buy it.
|

08-03-2005, 03:14 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
hahaha...I dare you to ask him a question......."Idea" why dont we all ask a question and bombade the poor fellow....lets do it...I will start....
I will ask how old it is........done
|

08-03-2005, 03:23 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
Yes, that's a good one! That's one real lazy seller!
The 6" refractor does not look too bad. Any of you bidding?
Ah yes, the 8" GSO Dob is back at $469 min. bid. I emailed the seller last week to tell them they'll have to lower their expectation if they really want to sell it, because the scope costs less new. Got no reply.
|

08-03-2005, 03:34 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
Striker, I think we're a bit late with the coordinated harassment. THere's only few hours to go. Still you never know... one of his feedbacks from a buyer says "SLOW START BUT GETS BETTER"!
|

08-03-2005, 03:35 PM
|
Who knows
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
|
|
Pretty funny. Don't want to put too much down, might put the buyer off.
|

08-03-2005, 07:48 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Posts: 246
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by janoskiss
Ah yes, the 8" GSO Dob is back at $469 min. bid. I emailed the seller last week to tell them they'll have to lower their expectation if they really want to sell it, because the scope costs less new. Got no reply.
|
Yes, I saw that one too. I asked whether the seller bought it at Andrew's and is now selling for a profit. I said nothing else. No answer either.
Although I did get GSO 9 and 25 mm eyepieces + moon filter for only $50 (with postage IIRC) from this seller a few months ago. They were as new condition so I don't really care whether they were used or not.
The GSO 25 mm looked huge next to my 0.965" plastic eyepieces. Now it looks little next to my 2" 30 mm superview
|

08-03-2005, 08:55 PM
|
 |
~Dust bunny breeder~
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
|
|
what else do you need t know?
its a telescope and its used...
you cant have it ken, i want it!
---------------------------
actually i can imagine whats happened...
wife: sell your scope! you love it more than you love me.
scope owner: No I wont
wife: I'll leave you!
scope owner: ok I'll put it on ebay. but if it doesnt sell it stays
|

09-03-2005, 11:02 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
 Ving! Not unlikely! It's been relisted with the exact same "description" & starting bid.
|

09-03-2005, 11:14 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Someone will buy it just to get him off ebay! lol
|

09-03-2005, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Posts: 246
|
|
They still haven't changed their ad, but I did get some info out of them.
"sorry about that it is a astronomy telescope 90mm. the technical specifications are model 300 focal length 1000mm resolving power 1.0 seconds focal ratio is 11.1 it comes with polar telescope 6x30mm finder and moon filter. aluminium tripod. it also comes with a manual for a refractor type of equatoral mount and an astronomy book. anything else you need to know just let me know."
Doesn't sound like $900 worth
|

09-03-2005, 11:23 PM
|
 |
4000 post club member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiG
Doesn't sound like $900 worth
|
Nope considering you can get a brand new C102 for about 200 less.
|

09-03-2005, 11:35 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
All that and he still doesn't name the brand, unless he can't spell 'Woolworths Supermarket'.
|

10-03-2005, 08:46 AM
|
 |
casual star gazer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lower Hunter Valley-Maitland
Posts: 264
|
|
mmm looks like a tasco 114 shame who ever took the photos doesn't know how it should be setup lol
|

10-03-2005, 09:10 AM
|
 |
~Dust bunny breeder~
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
|
|
lol!
ya know, looking at bugs like that would be fun.... but there are better ways.
|

10-03-2005, 10:04 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
|
|
These are only 76mm, and there are way too many of them (and the 60mm refractors) on ebay, generally all sold by just one or two sellers. They really P me off because they flood the telescope section with their junk, and make it much more difficult to spot real scopes/gear. Best way to look at the scope section is by doing an advanced search for nothing and excluding the leeches from the search results.
|

10-03-2005, 11:13 AM
|
 |
Compulsive Tinkerer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
|
|
I'd love to see anyone use the solar system "map"
|

10-03-2005, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Whats visual Astronomy
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
|
|
But that has to be a good scope...its SEMI PROFESSIONAL and its $0.99 cents....Bargain....lol
|

10-03-2005, 03:17 PM
|
![[1ponders]'s Avatar](../vbiis/customavatars/avatar45_9.gif) |
Retired, damn no pension
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
|
|
Well I'd like to find an uncharted constellation. I could finally get my name in lights in the sky. It could be called "The Pondering 1"
By the look of the quality of it I'm surprised they didn't offer one of those great solar filters to go with the moon filter.
No wonder it so hard to get people more involved in astronomy when this type of garbage is continually flogged off as a "professional" sorry "semi-professional" scope. It would be really disheartening for anyone who tried to use this for anything except land fill. It wouldn't even be strong enough to use as a trellis to grow a climber up.
Last edited by [1ponders]; 10-03-2005 at 03:23 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:20 AM.
|
|