Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-05-2013, 02:30 PM
Jon's Avatar
Jon (Jonathan)
Registered User

Jon is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 558
M53, and a $3.15 piece of kit

Here are a couple of images of M53. I quite like the good one, given the low altitiyde (about 22 degrees) and strong moonlight last night. The poor one was the night before, just posted for comparison. The difference? A $3.15 piece of kit assembled courtesy of Bunnings to lock the focus on the LX200 Classic.

The decent image is 21 x 3 min subs, ISO 800
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M53.jpg)
170.8 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (m53-crap.jpg)
189.8 KB42 views

Last edited by Jon; 27-05-2013 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-05-2013, 03:05 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Amazing! I'll have to try that on the LX50.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-05-2013, 03:16 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Did you find all the bits at bunnings?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-05-2013, 03:20 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
What a difference Jon. My Sbig camera was plagued with frosting for many months even after numerous oven baking and burned desiccants. I too went to Bunning for a couple of O-rings cost $2.50 for 10. Frosting was history since, still 9 O-rings to spare.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-05-2013, 04:13 PM
Jon's Avatar
Jon (Jonathan)
Registered User

Jon is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canberra
Posts: 558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poita View Post
Did you find all the bits at bunnings?
Yes - I had to get them to cut a 6" piece of 1/4" threaded steel, as they had no bolts that size; also I used 13mm irrigation tube connector instead of nylon spacers.

To be fair, my second crap image has been very badly processed. It was so out of focus because I'd screwed the mirror lock in too tight and it was distorting the mirror after I'd already focused it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-05-2013, 07:30 AM
Gem's Avatar
Gem (Grant)
The serenity...

Gem is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 926
I wonder about a Celestron C9.25 equivalent...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-05-2013, 09:11 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
The 9.25 doesn't have the shipping lock threads unfortunately. I used to use one of these and a SCT Crayford:
http://www.sciencecenter.net/hutech/misc/focuslk/index.htm\\
It helped a bit, and the crayford is a must I reckon, but this solution is the best I've seen.
http://www.marsastro.org/presentatio...irror-Lock.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement