Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Thanks Allan! I encourage you, and others here to give this data a go! It provides a few challenges in which help refine some of the common Photoshop techniques such as selection and feathering. Bert's has done a great job of collecting this data. I also enjoy seeing other variations. Being narrow band there is far greater flexibility with colour. Narrow band reveals an amazing amount of detail as this data shows.
Thanks again for sharing Bert! 
|
Your version is a real eye opener Jase! Please put up a larger jpg?
Maybe I just should shoot them and you can skin and gut them?
When I decided to go for an 'expensive' system part of my thinking was that it should be shared where possible as a resource for our small astronomy community. I have very strong vivid memories of hand guiding in the seventies with hypered film with a scope and mount I built myself and in the cold and all alone in what I was trying to do.
Now we have an online community at all levels that gives us all feedback no matter what our level of expertise is. So sharing the data for others to play with will only not only improve their knowledge but mine as well.
This new system can produce stunning results but as you and many others have shown very good data is only half the journey. Processing the data is a black art all on its own to get a very pleasing aesthetic final image.
There is only one dogma in science. Collect the ALL the relevant data with the best signal to noise before you use this as evidence to try to confirm your hypothesis as a better or new theory.
Too many of the pseudo scientists these days are just good at cherry picking to try and prove their own biased agenda.
Bert