Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #81  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:00 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astronovice View Post
As an example France has been supplying 70% of its needs from nuclear for decades now.
Few numbers: EU




World:



Looking for a good graph I saw showing the breakdown between nuclear and other energy sources for France only per sector (i.e industry, residential, etc). Will post shortly.

PS: Here you go. Added pic. Nuclear is yellow, Circled in blue fossil fuels (so oil/coal + gaz).
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (eupercapita.jpg)
200.0 KB45 views
Click for full-size image (world.jpg)
195.4 KB31 views
Click for full-size image (nuclear.jpg)
197.8 KB41 views

Last edited by multiweb; 02-01-2020 at 12:16 PM.
  #82  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:22 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astronovice View Post
........ You have strong views and have voiced them here, why not go further and canvass your views in the wider press? You may have sufficient support to make something further happen or you may not, you will never know if you don’t try. ...........
I've explored the notion of setting up (yet another) political party. Clearly if someone like Pauline Hanson can do it, it's not impossible, but so many well meaning groups (anyone remember Don Chip and the Australian Democrats?) have self destructed after starting with the best of intentions....and if history is our guide...any new startup would need to be very savvy indeed

None other than Tony Abbott, established a trust fund called "Australians for Honest Politics Trust" to help bankroll civil court cases against One Nation, with some success.

This ultimately led to the incarceration the party's founder, Pauline Hanson, for eleven weeks on trumped-up electoral fraud charges, which were subsequently dismissed on appeal.

(I think Hanson is a twit, but her treatment/ incarceration deserves far more than a footnote in Australian politics. This grubby litigation stunk to high-heaven. Despite all charges being dismissed on appeal, she was not compensated. (Sadly, freedoms in Australia have got seriously worse since)

This clearly shows the formation of a new political party in Australia, that actually has a chance of attracting a modest (One Nation has just 5000 members) voter base, will have the incumbent parties " Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war!". (read: I don't think I have the skills)
  #83  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:29 PM
Lucinda (Lucinda)
Registered User

Lucinda is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Alfred Cove
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1
"Devastated" areas look fine only several years later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_bluester View Post
I disagree. I live near Kilmore and I can still see obvious, visible evidence of where the Black Saturday fire that started near Kilmore East went through, that was nearly 11 years ago.
I wouldn't take it too seriously.
He's "gas lighting" you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
  #84  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:44 PM
Retrograde's Avatar
Retrograde (Pete)
a.k.a. @AstroscapePete

Retrograde is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,721
Doomism is unhelpful. We owe the kids of today and future generations a lot more than just throwing our hands in the air and saying 'sorry we're out of ideas'.


Renato:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post
dubious claims that renewables will lower the cost of electricity which has been soaring for the last decade to the highest in the world as cheap coal fired power has been destroyed.
The dubious claim was always that renewables caused the highest power prices in the world. It was always a lot more complicated than that (including privatisation and lack of investment in the grid etc). Coal fired power isn't cheap - it's costing us our environment, our farms and our safety.

The good news however is that renewables have already lowered the cost of power. South Australia has now had the cheapest wholesale power in Australia for consecutive months!
https://www.theguardian.com/australi...id-audit-finds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post
I point out that if Australia closed down all its power it would have had zilch effect on CO2 level in the atmosphere given Chinese output.
1.5% is not zilch no matter how many times you say it. If you add our exported emissions then we're responsible for somewhere between 3.3% and 4.8% of global emissions (depending how you measure them) which would potentially put us into the top 5 or 6 emitters in the world. Definitely not zilch!
The combined emissions of all countries who emit less than 2% individually, combine to roughly equal the US and China combined so we clearly all have to do our share.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post

You claim that my statement about China's increasing coal-fired power output is simply wrong and link me to an article saying that China is buying less coal, and digging more up themselves
Sorry yes I should have read the article I referenced more thoroughly.
The news is still not quite as gloomy as you imply however. In 2017, renewable energy comprised 36.6% of China’s total installed electric power capacity, and 26.4% of total power generation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renato1 View Post
You seem to not know that the Paris Accords allow for China and India to keep building the coal fired plants that they are building.
That is simply an argument for stronger and more binding global agreements.

I'm pro-nuclear as well as being pro-renewables. New nuclear designs hold great promise along with/as-well-as technologies such as molten salt storage. The reality is, however, that nuclear is still a way off (at best) for our country and emissions reduced today are worth considerably more than emissions reduced in 25 or 30 years time.
  #85  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:50 PM
Astronovice (Calvin)
Registered User

Astronovice is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Cairns Northern Beaches
Posts: 81
Data source

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Few numbers: EU




World:



Looking for a good graph I saw showing the breakdown between nuclear and other energy sources for France only per sector (i.e industry, residential, etc). Will post shortly.

PS: Here you go. Added pic. Nuclear is yellow, Circled in blue fossil fuels (so oil/coal + gaz).
Marc

I used this article to support my comments.

https://technology.ihs.com/600137/frances-energy-pledge
  #86  
Old 02-01-2020, 12:51 PM
The_bluester's Avatar
The_bluester (Paul)
Registered User

The_bluester is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kilmore, Australia
Posts: 3,364
For gaslighting to work though there has to be some prospect of making me think I am wrong. However people who can’t go and look for themselves at the after effects take statements like that as bing correct, particularly if it lines up with their own thinking, confirmation bias style.
  #87  
Old 02-01-2020, 01:10 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astronovice View Post
Marc

I used this article to support my comments.

https://technology.ihs.com/600137/frances-energy-pledge
Hi Calvin, I don't know about IHS Markit data source. That pie chart looks like power generation so I assume electricity only which makes sense. The graph Jancovici supplies is total energy allocation. From transport to heating. The country relies heavily on fossil fuels.

So does Australia. If I put solar panels on my roof I'll offset my power bill and possibly do something good for the enviroment (unless they're made in China). It's not going to help anybody else or even myself moving from A to B, get food to eat, water to drink, get medical services, education for the kids, etc... Our whole services industry is deeply rooted in fossil fuels.

So as Peter B. says, not a simple problem to solve. The graphs I posted show the huge difference in proportion between renewables and fossil fuels. We're addicted to fossil fuels. Like it or not cutting the branch we're all sitting on isn't very productive. I'm all for cutting emission. Got to be smart about it.

If we want to be serious about limiting global warming to 1.5c, forget it. We've already pumped too much CO2 in the atmosphere. 2C? we have to can all coal fired power plants by 2030 and as of tomorrow use 3 times less power than we do right now. Can we do it? Possibly. But do we want to do it?
  #88  
Old 02-01-2020, 01:10 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,427
Far too many political references in this whole post. I am on holidays and don't have the time to look at all this so thread closed
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement