Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #61  
Old 12-01-2011, 06:58 PM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
And if the present conditions keep up for any longer and you get a typical NQ downpour, you're in big trouble.
Rain has stopped here, just showers now, it's all moving west and south towards Melbourne. It's already broken all records for everything. Power is off all over town and I'm just waiting for the Internet and phones to stop although we should retain power here. Long range predictions are for a cyclone around Jan28th. It's been a long time since we've had one, they used to hit every year when I was growing up and usually more than one.
  #62  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:04 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
Yes, we know you like to stir the pot Mark, but most of the rest of us are not quite that deluded....

I am not stirring the pot, I am stating a fact that can be observed by anyone willing to look e.g go to the pilbra after a huge cyclone and look, the buildings are all still standing, why might that be??? If anyone is deluded I would say it would have to be the tree hugging greenies, save the trees you cry, dont touch a twig.....last time I was in Hobart half of tasmania was on fire, well done .

Cheers

Mark

Last edited by marki; 12-01-2011 at 07:25 PM.
  #63  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:23 PM
tlgerdes's Avatar
tlgerdes (Trevor)
Love the moonless nights!

tlgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
If there is a flood where I am building, It'll be a final drink I suspect and I will start to believe in a "higher power"...
Altitude: 550m.
Start packing or drinking, Toowoomba was at 700m altitude.
  #64  
Old 12-01-2011, 07:52 PM
andrew2008
Registered User

andrew2008 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane. Aus
Posts: 349
A lot of people seem to think the dam didn't do it's job. How much worse would this have been if it wasn't there though. Floods levels of the 1890's would easily have been seen.

Last edited by andrew2008; 12-01-2011 at 08:11 PM.
  #65  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:52 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew2008 View Post
A lot of people seem to think the dam didn't do it's job.
No doubt.

The Brisbane river has had *major* floods in 1841, 1863, 1890, 1893 (really bad at 8 metres), 1916, 1974 and now in 2011, with dam. (Bureau of Met historical data)

You'd think the powers that be might have picked up on the fact these events:
1) are not rare
2) cause massive devistation and loss of life
3) far more (civil engineering) needs to be done...
  #66  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:57 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
No doubt.

The Brisbane river has had *major* floods in ...snip... in 2011, with dam. (Bureau of Met historical data)
Ah yes the BOM, are they like the CSIRO..? Because accordinmg to some the CSIRO is just full of government paid psuedo scientists who miss represent the truth on behalf of the Climate Change drummers, just to keep themselves in jobs...
  #67  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:08 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Anyhow getting back on track ....are there any civil engineering examples where changes have been made to successfully combat flooding? Perhaps pointing the pollies towards such examples would be more constructive.


Mark
  #68  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:15 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Given these houses are built on frequently flooded land, whatever happened to he queenslander home built on stilts ?
With today's engineering you should be able to use steel poles for the supportnwhich will take a moderate "bash" and a bit of current.
Perhaps not if you are in the centre of an extreme hit but just flooding... One wonders.
  #69  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:29 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Given these houses are built on frequently flooded land, whatever happened to he queenslander home built on stilts ?
With today's engineering you should be able to use steel poles for the supportnwhich will take a moderate "bash" and a bit of current.
Perhaps not if you are in the centre of an extreme hit but just flooding... One wonders.

Yes Clive I was thinking the same thing perhaps using piles driven well into the ground could help? I mean they manage to stabilise oil rigs in heavy seas a light wieght structure like a house shouldn't prove too much of a problem.

Mark
  #70  
Old 12-01-2011, 09:30 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Unlocked and offending posts deleted.

please keep to topic and refrain from personal attacks.

Last edited by [1ponders]; 12-01-2011 at 09:50 PM.
  #71  
Old 13-01-2011, 06:22 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernova1965 View Post
these cities were built in the wrong place to begin with
well not quite. At the time that the Brisbane area was first settled, it was the only logical place to build a city. All traffic came and went by the river and the sea.
  #72  
Old 13-01-2011, 07:10 PM
thunderchildobs
Registered User

thunderchildobs is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Aust
Posts: 638
Wivenhoe is on the Brisbane river, however the Bremer river which passes through Ipswich, joins the Brisbane river at Riverview / Mogil, which is well down stream from Wivenhoe.
Wivenhoe does not stop any flooding caused by the water from Bremer joining the Brisbane river. There are no dams on the Bremer.
  #73  
Old 13-01-2011, 07:16 PM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by adman View Post
well not quite. At the time that the Brisbane area was first settled, it was the only logical place to build a city. All traffic came and went by the river and the sea.
I am talking about a CITY not a settlement when the settlement shows signs of growing the people used English experience of the homeland and no understanding of local conditions when allowing growth in the wrong location. Flood plains are the ideal place for food production and commerce and industry and housing need to be in a safe environment
  #74  
Old 13-01-2011, 07:20 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderchildobs View Post
Wivenhoe is on the Brisbane river, however the Bremer river which passes through Ipswich, joins the Brisbane river at Riverview / Mogil, which is well down stream from Wivenhoe.
Wivenhoe does not stop any flooding caused by the water from Bremer joining the Brisbane river. There are no dams on the Bremer.
Excellent point.
  #75  
Old 13-01-2011, 08:51 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernova1965 View Post
I am talking about a CITY not a settlement when the settlement shows signs of growing the people used English experience of the homeland and no understanding of local conditions when allowing growth in the wrong location. Flood plains are the ideal place for food production and commerce and industry and housing need to be in a safe environment
yes but the city started from a settlement, and and that settlement was only able to grow because of its location on an easily navigable river with easy access to the goods produced by the city and the sea.
  #76  
Old 13-01-2011, 08:53 PM
Jeffkop's Avatar
Jeffkop (Jeff)
Star-Fishing

Jeffkop is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tuckurimba
Posts: 885
Throughout history the prime consideration of settlement is water. Its logical to me then that these settlements were located close to rivers and then they prospered and grew from settlements to cities. Not to discount all the other valid reasons that were advantageous by being close to a river. Its also logical then that from time to time co-existing with a river brings with it the dilemna of a flood. If people think they are going to be able to indemnify themselves completely from all the different kinds of disasters that their environs present (both temporary or permanent) they are in a fairytale and so in fantasyland when ever theres a problem then its always got to be someones fault ... because fantasyland is PERFECT, and if its not ... someones to blame!!!
  #77  
Old 13-01-2011, 09:07 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Given these houses are built on frequently flooded land, whatever happened to he queenslander home built on stilts ?
With today's engineering you should be able to use steel poles for the supportnwhich will take a moderate "bash" and a bit of current.
Perhaps not if you are in the centre of an extreme hit but just flooding... One wonders.
I agree.
I use to live in Moree which is on a great big flood plain with black soil as foundations.
Despite this the building code was that all new buildings or renovations had to have floor level 500mm above the highest known flood (1954). Only the old houses don't comply and lots of them have been lifted on stilts to comply.
I'm not sure why the same rules wouldn't apply in Brisbane. Many of the houses we are seeing flooded on the media images are not old houses.
Have the Qld councils in these areas decided not to bother with similar rules?
  #78  
Old 13-01-2011, 10:02 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop View Post
... If people think they are going to be able to indemnify themselves completely from all the different kinds of disasters that their environs present (both temporary or permanent) they are in a fairytale ...
The Mississipi has literally several 1000km's of levees etc...that for the greater part, work. Even Grafton saved themselves alot of grief by doing the same.

Last time I was in Brisbane...can't say I noticed any levees or similar structures.

Do you not think it rather odd, that for a river that regularly floods in no small manner (with zippo flood control from the Bremer) ...that more has not been done in the last 100 or so years?

Yet we have the CBD of Australia's 3rd major capitol under water.....massive loss of property, and sadly loss of life....again.

Not rocket science IMHO.
  #79  
Old 13-01-2011, 10:29 PM
adman (Adam)
Seriously Amateur

adman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,279
Peter if it is not rocket science, I would love to hear your proposal for a levee that would protect brisbane from flooding

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
The Mississipi has literally several 1000km's of levees etc...that for the greater part, work. Even Grafton saved themselves alot of grief by doing the same.

Last time I was in Brisbane...can't say I noticed any levees or similar structures.

Do you not think it rather odd, that for a river that regularly floods in no small manner (with zippo flood control from the Bremer) ...that more has not been done in the last 100 or so years?

Yet we have the CBD of Australia's 3rd major capitol under water.....massive loss of property, and sadly loss of life....again.

Not rocket science IMHO.
  #80  
Old 13-01-2011, 10:45 PM
coldspace's Avatar
coldspace
Registered User

coldspace is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Given these houses are built on frequently flooded land, whatever happened to he queenslander home built on stilts ?
With today's engineering you should be able to use steel poles for the supportnwhich will take a moderate "bash" and a bit of current.
Perhaps not if you are in the centre of an extreme hit but just flooding... One wonders.
There are still plenty of Qld'er homes on stilts, problem now is many people have built in underneath them to make bigger living areas to keep up with the growing modern lifestyle and these now flood through causing alot more property damage than 74, as well as the massive influx of population growth from the other states over the last 20 years which has seen lots of property sub-divided up making it worse as well.

I think concerning the gravity of the situation the current emergency workers and those organising them"pollies" are doing a fantastic job and I will be taking a week off soon from my buisiness to go and help clean mud out of houses including houses of friends of mine.
My hats go off to those helping us out, at least our pollies did not stand around waiting like what happened after hurricane Katrina in the US.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement