The more I read, the less it seems that renewable energy technology is the issue - as many posts here have demonstrated, there are lots of exciting new technologies for renewable generation and storage. The big problem seems to be that our local fossil energy suppliers misjudged the market by a huge amount and are now wallowing in excess capacity in both generation and distribution. Rather than see them go under, it looks like the government is trying to restrict competition from additional excess capacity as more renewables come on line - hence their desire to get rid of the RET or at least reduce it (as happened). By all accounts, we will continue to have excess thermal capacity for more than a decade into the future, so don't expect future governments to be too sympathetic to renewables - I suspect that the fossil fuel lobby (and part of the media) will not let that happen. I guess that the huge overcapacity also explains why we pay so much for power - someone has to pay for the excess thermal generators and power lines and we have significantly less manufacturing industry left to help.
So it seems that the primary driver behind the obvious campaign to demonise renewables is a profitability crunch in the fossil power industry - the problem is not that renewables are not yet good enough, but that they are already too successful. I wonder what impediments will be put in the way of home battery systems..
https://retreview.dpmc.gov.au/sites/...ril%202014.pdf
http://www.aemo.com.au/News-and-Even...-next-10-Years
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-0...t-says/5658926