Quote:
Originally Posted by DJDD
alex, i just read a bit on the 'push' theory of gravity but could not get to the end...
so, is the premise that gravity is caused by inelastic collisions of particles (gravitons? light? ultra-mundane corpuscles?) with bodies such as planets, stars, people, and that the attraction of two bodies is really a result of shadowing and uneven pressure?
if so, and if the interactions are inelastic, would we not see a lot slow collision particles as their energy is lost during collision?
anyway, no real idea what i am talking about...
cheers,
DJDD
|
Dear DJDD...
I am so sorry that I appeared to ignore your post but for whatever reason I simply missed it...how I dont know.
As to your first question the shadowing and uneven pressure is the way I believe things work.
As to question two I expect that may be right but slow in that world probably would not be slow.
This is speculation and given in my humble opinion but I suspect there are many particles available to do the job and even if we could detect whatever particle is responsible for the conditions I suggest how to measure a single interaction I can not imagine how it could be done.
As all point out one needs proof supported by math and observation..well I have no math in support of anything I believe but look at various things and draw my morosopic conclusions...
I do think that the relationship between electricity and gravity would not be difficult from my observations of the sprite thing.
I see the "elve" as the first contact the flow has with our atmosphere.. only part of it of course because most simply passes by and thru the Earth without contact.
However the "elve" seems to become a sprite and continue on as lightning... and so in that I suspect that may be the relationship between gravity (the imbalance in flow of everything and resulting variations of flow pressure) and electricity.
I see the cloud lightning relationship in this context as the same as a wire (the cloud) in a genny interfering with the flow and "harvesting" the flow as electricity... I can draw similar when looking at a solar panel...but that is me... it is a mere belief.
I thought space has a physical grip as it were and so that is why I believed the space craft would slow up.
I see what is called weightlessness in space not as an absence of gravity but the reverse in that as the flow is not shielded from any direction it "holds up" from every direction which we interperet as weightless.
I beleive the Sun's Corona is the out flow of the Sun interacting with the "flow" and this interaction results in the higher temps in the Corona than could reasonably be expected.
Again sorry for missing your post.
AND never worry about not understanding stuff that does not mean one has to try and think about stuff.
My thing is I believe that General Relativity does not grasp the issue of gravity although it is very useful of that there is no doubt however I feel it will never allow us to unite the forces.
The only reason such interests me is because DrA was so interested in doing this and failed.
I also believe he was on the money when he glimpsed the apparent necessity to have a pushing force to hold the Universe in place as it were..I feel he pulled back because the observations (by Mr Hubble) suggested the Universe was expanding so he felt he was on the wrong track.
I beleive he was close because attraction does not cut it...attraction demands that we entertain "dark matter" and to me that seems fanciful..why should we live in a Universe that has matter undetectable other than by inference when in a "push universe" we do not need dark matter. The razor pushes me to the push side it is at least simple.
As am I.
They enlist dark matter to expalin why the outter stars orbit faster well if you think of it the ammount of matter one would have to place outside the galaxy to arrive at such a propostion would be enormous... and even without a math proof feel confident that if anyone worked it out what I say will be found inarguable...
Folk think I am crazy and mostly I must agree with them because to change a paridime such as attraction is impossible but having approached all matters on the premise of this "flow" I can make a pretty good Universe...one that I can not make any other way.